Skip to content
Sign up free
News

A Pandemic of Closures

By Susannah Kopecky

2-minute read

Another one bites the dust. In tragic  news for California, the state just lost another big-name business.  EA’S Pandemic Studios was a beloved maker of video games, and will  cease to function, at least physically, in California. In an interview  with Kotaku, the studio’s CEO, John Riccitiello, blamed  the loss of the studio on ridiculous levels of taxation and the high  price of living in the state, and explained that as a  businessman, working in California simply no longer made sense.

“For  good or for bad, we are taking down headcount in California because  it is really expensive,” Kotaku said.

According to Kotaku, in the interview Riccititello  cited “recent regulatory changes” and the lack of tax incentives  in the state, and further claimed that it costs “two to three times  more to employ developers in that state [California] than it does in  Montreal, the U.K., Eastern Europe or China.” Unfortunately for about  200 employees of Pandemic, the perhaps business savvy move translates  to lost jobs.

Tragic, but realistic: there is only  so much money state lawmakers can squeeze out of businesses and the  wealthy, before businesses and wealthy individuals simply pack up. Some  individuals and businesses will retain their business in California  for sentimental reasons, but after a certain amount of abuse, even they  will exit the Golden State in order to find true opportunity. What happened  to the idea of California as a state of innovation, creativity and a place to buck the status quo? Raising taxes on businesses has been done before,  and done badly, on the East Coast.

Unless lawmakers hope to continue to  scare away business interests, they need to seriously consider the fact  that smart businesspeople will not spend extra overheard forever. Pandemic  Studios is just one entertainment provider, but it is representative  of a growing problem: California is known as the movie capital of the  world, but why would filmmakers continue to throw money away to film  here, when it is significantly cheaper to film elsewhere?

Officials  in other states recognize that the market is opening. For example, in  Arizona, the Arizona  Department of Commerce offers a number of benefits and tax breaks to those who come to film  in the state. These include a Transaction Privilege Tax Exemption and  an income tax credit. In Oregon, the Governor’s  Office of Film & Television offers cash rebates in the form of rebates on 20% of “Oregon-based  goods and services” used, in addition to a “cash payment of up to  16.2% of wages paid to production personnel.” The office also points  out that there is no sales tax in Oregon. Compare that to prohibitively  high filming prices and an increasing sales tax in California, and it  becomes easier to see why some businesses would rather close and/or  relocate outside of California, than to stay in this beautiful state  and hemorrhage cash.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

A Pandemic of Closures

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us