Skip to content
Subscribe

NSA and GCHQ: Intelligence Gathering Turns Into Public Manipulation

Published:

Edward Snowden’s trove of documents acquired from the National Security Agency (NSA) has provided a blueprint for understanding the structure and design of intelligence agencies around the world. Thus far, a major theme among the Snowden leaks relate to how the NSA and GCHQ intercepts communication by monitoring phone calls, text messages, email, Internet history/activity, and even remotely accessing personal computers and mobile devices.

A Snowden leak from the Guardian revealed that the British Government Communications Headquarters, GCHQ, aided by the NSA, intercepted more than 1.8 million Yahoo user accounts and webcam photos at random from around the globe in a program labeled, “Optic Nerve.” According to the Guardian, Yahoo reacted furiously and a spokesperson accused the agencies of “a whole new level of violation of our users’ privacy.” Many users were outraged as a large number of the photos were sexually explicit.

Although this leak may infuriate some, it may not be enough to convince those who still have faith in the NSA’s presumed good intentions.

Glenn Greenwald sheds some light in his newest and most damning revelation on the GCHQ secret unit, JTRIG (Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group), and its intention to manipulate public thought and discourse through an elaborate training program labeled, “The Art of Deception: Training for Online Covert Operations.”One of the first few slides for the training program introduces the “4 D’s:

Deny, Disrupt, Degrade, Deceive.” These techniques involve rhetoric strategies to develop a strong ethos among the agent, numerous devices for exploiting human interaction, and multiple methods to cause disruption once they have established their credibility

Another remarkable aspect to this program is the amount of psychological and social consideration that went into designing this system. They investigated how human beings can be influenced through leaders, trust, obedience, and compliance. They constructed a program purely designed to manipulate human beings.

The fact that the government has programs designed to spread lies and work to destroy legacies of whomever they wish brings the moral and ethical intentions of the agencies into question.

General Keith Alexander, the current director of the NSA, justifies the NSA’s controversial actions claiming that their work has stopped numerous terrorist attacks to date, and remains a pivotal tool for protecting the U.S. and its allies. However, the facts behind this claim remain muddled. The NSA is authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA), which grants NSA permission to run unknown projects, based on classified interpretations of the law.

NSA dissidents claim the right to privacy for personal reasons while invoking violations of the Fourth Amendment as the legal means to discredit the program. And due to the NSA’s secrecy, they also claim that there is no proof that the NSA has ever prevented a terrorist attack.

Our governments are pushing their boundaries (as acknowledged by JTRIG) and it’s fair to say that the public deserves disclosure on the scope of information that the government collects and, in this case, distributes among its people.The NSA is well known for refusing to comment on intelligence matters, but this JTRIG program demands an explanation on how it can be acceptable for a government agency to deliberately lie in order to manipulate the public under a confidential agency.

In summation, the world's intelligence agencies can continue to hide behind their veil of secrecy, but if the Snowden leaks continue to shock and frustrate the masses, the NSA will eventually have to speak and justify their controversial programs. It’s important to remember that Snowden downloaded around 1.7 million documents, and these revelations are far from over.

More controversial reports are sure to come, and with those reports, transparency is essential in order for the public to be informed so they can decide whether or not the NSA lays claim to any legal, moral, or ethical justifications.

Photo Credit: Google

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

NSA and GCHQ: Intelligence Gathering Turns Into Public Manipulation

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us