Skip to content
Subscribe

NIMBY Thinking Everywhere

Published:

It's all about NIMBY - Not In My Backyard - thinking in California.  Cut the budget, except for my sacred cow.

The Sacramento Bee reports that a community group is pushing the City Council to rescind its 35 percent cut in the budget of the Department of Parks and Recreation that would - among other provisions - reduce lawn-mowing from once a week to once every three weeks and close bathrooms except for special events.

None of the cuts seem like particularly good ideas for the city, but neither does the $50 million deficit it is facing.   Yet the decision to cut maintenance costs at the parks has resulted in the marshaling of the Land Park Community Association's parks committee to fight the plan.

So the Parks people would prefer that the cuts be found in other areas.  Let's just say, for example, police and fire.  But then, the police and fire community associations will explain why such cuts will be disastrous.  On and on it goes, until the only possible cuts are those without a constituency to protect them.

On a statewide level, students and faculty are protesting tuition increases at the UC and CSU systems despite the fact that California's state universities are among the best bargains in the country.  The San Francisco Medical Society board of directors has voted to oppose propositions 1D and 1E, which would impact funding for children's services and mental health services, respectively.   Board president Charles Wibbelsman told me San Francisco Chronicle, "It is sad that when financial constraints become severe the most vulnerable are often the first to be targeted, and we oppose that -- especially when the programs in question have been working well,"

And a 10 percent proposed cut in Medi-Cal is opposed by the California Association of Medical Product Suppliers, whose "talking points" package ends with this directive to their members: "LET THEM KNOW YOU ARE A SMALL BUSINESS CONSTITUENT THAT DIDN'T CAUSE THE STATE'S FISCAL CRISIS."

Every one of the individual concerns by interest groups are logical and, to one degree or another, compelling.  But California is attempting to meet a real-world budget crisis, which may cause us to default on our debts and create even more pain for the state and its citizens.  Someone has to prioritize the cuts despite the NIMBY factor involved.   The alternative is massive cuts to the few programs that have no friends to protect them.

Prioritizing cost reductions and revenue increases is a necessity in the current economy, and while citizen protests are a cherished tradition, we all need to take some of our NIMBY thinking off the table.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

NIMBY Thinking Everywhere

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us