Skip to content
Subscribe

How many tax initiatives can Californians handle?

By Lucy Ma
Published:
gov_brown_tax_initiatives

This fall, California voters will potentially have the opportunity to vote for not one, but three competing tax measures aimed at addressing the state’s ever increasing budget woes. Governor Jerry Brown, the California Federation of Teachers, and civil rights attorney Molly Munger have all proposed varying tax measures that seek to qualify for the same November ballot.

While essentially trying to address the same issue, the initiatives differ widely in approach, pitching an ever popular “tax the rich” slogan against the more pragmatic proposal of temporarily increasing taxes for the majority of Californians.

Voters tend not to like the words tax hike, much less three times on the same ballot. This seems to be the very argument made by Gov. Brown and his legion of supporters. Brown, who has long sought to clear the field of any rival measures, now faces the reality of having to scramble for monetary and public support against his competition. While the Governor has retained the backing of heavyweights State Employees International Union and the California Teachers Association, recent developments seem to signal a split in labor ranks with Munger gaining the Parent-Teacher Association’s official endorsement, and the powerful California Nurses Association siding with the California Federation of Teachers. By closely examining how each initiative aims to divvy the projected revenue pie, current alliances tend to make a little more sense.

California State Senator Ted Lieu, a vocal opponent of Munger’s initiative, has taken to his Twitter in an effort to consolidate support behind Brown’s plan for fear of confusing voters into rejecting all three.

February 10, 2012
February 8, 2012
February 8, 2012

The trouble with democracy is that everyone has a right to their opinion, and in this case the right to push a competing initiative. Perhaps the Governor will have more luck in qualifying his initiative than he did in getting its predecessor passed through a democrat controlled legislature.

Also worth noting, the Legislative Analyst’s Office has raised serious education concerns regarding Brown’s proposed Plan B, which the Governor would have to pursue through “risky” budget maneuvers should voters reject his multi-billion dollar tax hike at the ballot boxes this November.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

How many tax initiatives can Californians handle?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us