Skip to content
Subscribe

A look at three potential marijuana initiatives in California

Published:

In 2010, Proposition 19, the Regulate, Control & Tax Cannabis Act, received enough valid petition signatures (nearly 700,000) to qualify for the November ballot, but failed to become law with 53% of Californians voting "No" and 46% voting "Yes." This election cycle, there have been at least three proposals for ballot initiatives to soften the Golden State's laws on marijuana.

Let's take a look at all three:

The Marijuana Penalties Act of 2012

According to its filing, this initiative would increase the amount of marijuana that can be possessed, cultivated, sold, or transported by someone over the age of 21 without committing a misdemeanor from one ounce (which is currently merely an infraction in California) to two ounces. The initiative would reduce penalties for possession, cultivation, or sale of up to two ounces of marijuana for adults over the age of 21, while making it a misdemeanor for those under the age of 21.

The Regulate Marijuana Like Wine Act of 2012

This initiative would use the model of alcohol regulation and control to introduce marijuana into a legal, regulated market. It would decriminalize the possession, cultivation, sale, transportation, and recreational use of marijuana plants, retroactively dismiss court cases pending against defendants that are inconsistent with the new policy, and authorize the sale of products with THC (the psychoactive substance in marijuana). According to one supporter:

"We’re taking something that’s unregulated and we’re replacing it with a known successful program implemented by the California alcohol beverage control board. We know it works great with wine. It’s already in place."

The Repeal Cannabis Prohibition Act of 2012

Finally, this initiative would decriminalize the possession, cultivation, sale, transportation, and recreational use of marijuana plants by adults aged 19 or older in the state of California, create a California Cannabis Commission to regulate commercial cultivation and sale of the plant, but allow up to three pounds per person of marijuana to be exempt from taxation and regulation for personal use.

The California Legislative Analyst's Office estimates the fiscal impact of the first initiative above to be entirely uncertain, while pegging the second and third initiatives above at potentially "hundreds of millions of dollars" in new tax revenue, tens of millions in savings to state and local governments for the "regulate like wine" initiative, and the "low hundreds of millions" in savings for the "repeal prohibition" proposal.

To qualify for the November ballot, each of the three proposals' supporters will need to collect 504,760 signatures for their respective proposals by April 19, 2012.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

A look at three potential marijuana initiatives in California

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us