Skip to content
Sign up free
Midterms

Nebraska’s Senate Race Is Officially Osborn vs. Ricketts—Unless Republicans Stop It

Nebraska’s Senate Race Is Officially Osborn vs. Ricketts—Unless Republicans Stop It
Image: Obtained from Dan Osborn's Facebook page. Use of image does not indicate or mean endorsement.

Recent polling has Osborn +5 on the incumbent, with earlier polls showing him down 1. No poll shows the Republican pulling clear in a state Trump carried by 20 points.

By Matt Shinners

2-minute read

Independent Dan Osborn is officially on Nebraska's November ballot, the secretary of state's office announced Thursday, verifying at least 6,096 valid signatures against the 4,000 required.

A day later, Democratic nominee Cindy Burbank, who won the May primary on a promise to step aside and let Osborn take on incumbent Republican Sen. Ricketts in a head-to-head race, filed paperwork declining the nomination.

If it holds, that leaves the two-way race Osborn and state Democrats have wanted: independent against Republican incumbent Pete Ricketts, with no Democrat splitting the anti-Ricketts vote.

The state of the race

The money tells the structural story. Through June 30, Osborn had raised about $5.75 million for the cycle—roughly 96% from individual donors, nothing from his own pocket—and held $2.42 million on hand. Ricketts has raised $11.2 million through June 30, with $5.25 million as a contribution to his own campaign, $3.6 million from other committees, and $2.2 million from individuals.

Head-to-head polling has been close but almost entirely sponsored by Osborn’s campaign or groups aligned with the candidate. Recent polling has Osborn +5 on the incumbent, with earlier polls showing him down 1. No poll shows the Republican pulling clear in a state Trump carried by 20 points.

The Fight Over Letting Democratic Candidate Burbank Leave

This race has been a mess from the start. The Democratic primary featured a Trump supporter and the eventual winner, Cindy Burbank, who won the nomination promising to drop out of the race and let Osborn take on Ricketts head-to-head. She's filed to remove herself from the ballot in November, but her exit isn't guaranteed.

Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen said he would ask Attorney General Mike Hilgers whether the state must honor her withdrawal, filed roughly two weeks before the August 3 deadline. The irony: Evnen's office spent the spring trying to keep Burbank off the primary ballot as a bad-faith candidate, only for the state Supreme Court to reinstate her.

Now it's weighing whether to force a nominee to stay on a ballot she's asked to leave—keeping a Democrat in a race the Democratic Party has tried to clear for Osborn.

What To Watch

Hilgers' guidance is the immediate flashpoint—whether Nebraska accepts Burbank's declination or tries to keep her name on the ballot, and whether that spawns another lawsuit before August 3.

Beyond that, watch Republican Party spending: with the Supreme Court's NRSC v. FEC ruling lifting coordination limits, a national party is now free to spend unlimited sums defining Osborn—firepower that landed late against him when he ran in 2024.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Set the canonical URL of your copy to the original IVN article (the HTML we give you includes the tag).
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Nebraska’s Senate Race Is Officially Osborn vs. Ricketts—Unless Republicans Stop It

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us