Skip to content
Subscribe

Medical Marijuana Shops Banned By Los Angeles City Council

Published:

Credit: marijuanalawyerblog.com

The Los Angeles City Council voted unanimously last Tuesday to ban medical marijuana dispensaries within city limits. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is expected to sign it into law, setting up a major battle as well as legal confusion.

There are upwards of 900 medical marijuana dispensaries in the city of Los Angeles. Ubiquitous and powerful neighborhood councils (and others) complained that dispensaries drew marijuana smokers who would medicate on the sidewalks.  Neighborhood councils have enough clout that the city council listened, and then acted.

But this does seem like a classic case of a local government ignoring or fumbling around a problem then deciding they need to do something and over-reacting.  Further complicating this will be the inevitable lawsuits attempting to block the City Council’s decision. Besides the people of California approved medical use of marijuana in 1996 so how can Los Angeles say they won’t follow law? Los Angeles County just tried banning dispensaries too, and a district court overturned the ban. So it’s difficult to see how the city council thinks it can succeed. Perhaps they’re just trying to mollify the neighborhood councils.

The appeals court overturned a ban on medical marijuana dispensaries in unincorporated parts of Los Angeles County, concluding that the ordinance was pre-empted by state law.

The Council’s plan manages to be disjointed, confused, ineffective, and to raise eyebrows at the same time. It bans dispensaries, comically called a “gentle ban” by one councilmember, replacing them with collectives of three or less people who will be allowed to grow their own. Yes, I’m sure granny in her wheelchair who smokes marijuana to ease chronic pain will easily be able to find two friends to grow marijuana with, especially if they all live in small apartments. Here’s a tip. Growing marijuana indoors without serious security is an invitation for break-ins. And you can’t hide the smell of blooming marijuana.

Bizarrely, the city council exempted 170 specific dispensaries from closing. Inquiring minds want to know just why certain dispensaries were exempted. While the reasons here may well be pure and unsullied, upon first glance, this does appear to reek more than a bedroom full of sensimilla plants in full bud. Sorry, but you can’t say you want to ban something then simultaneously say you sometimes support it. People might think you’re smoking something.

Californian voted for and are strongly in favor of medical marijuana. Cities and counties should stop trying to overrule them and instead do what they are supposed to do, be servants of the people.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Medical Marijuana Shops Banned By Los Angeles City Council

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us