Skip to content
Subscribe

Are We Looking At a New GOP?

Published:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoeKUAIf9Vg

Following the 2012 presidential elections, Republicans recognized the need to diversify their voting population after Obama won 71 percent of the Hispanic vote, 67 percent of single women, 60 percent of 18-29 year olds, and 93 percent of African-Americans.

More recently, the California GOP recognized the dire need to reimage themselves, sparking the “rebuild, renew, reclaim” campaign seen at the 2014 California GOP convention.Luckily, the new Republican National Committee (RNC)

advertising campaign aims to tackle this issue head on.

They’ve created 12 new ads, each one running around 30 seconds. The ads include Americans of varying ethnicities making generalized statements that they are Republicans because they support typical American values like opportunity for all, investing in childhood education, a strong military, religious freedom, and an all of the above energy policy.

On a positive note, these ads may represent a shift away from the attack ads which dominated the 2012 election. Also, the people in these ads make rational claims which most people would agree with.

Unfortunately, the ads make sweeping generalizations without acknowledging any GOP ideas or proposed social programs legitimizing these claims -- a dangerous precedent for future elections.

A quick glimpse into Paul Ryan’s budget plan in 2013-- which threatened to cut Pell Grants, school lunches, and temporary assistance to needy families -- highlights the contradictions between recent GOP policies and the new ad campaign's promise to invest in the future for our kids. Recently, the RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, spoke about new electoral primary policies regarding debates.

“[W]e’re proposing to have fewer than 10, and this time around, we’re going to pick the moderators,” he said.

Rather than establishing an open platform for discussion and debate, Priebus is limiting the candidate’s means to participate in real political discourse. And as chairman of the RNC, he’s also working to simplify the Republican identity to basic American ideals such as religious freedom, opportunity, and equality.

The intention behind the GOP’s ads is not definite, but it’s worth investigating whether their claims to supporting the aforementioned values are a smokescreen designed to gain political support while disengaging their candidates from articulating their stances on controversial issues, which could alienate voters as seen in the 2012 elections.

Instead of finding a way to connect with voters on policy-based issues, it appears the GOP have redesigned their campaign to hide their actual policies behind the values intrinsic to American national identity.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Are We Looking At a New GOP?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us