Skip to content
Subscribe

Legally Erasing Stigmas about Medical Marijuana

By Indy
Published:

In 1996, Californians passed Proposition 215 , which made it possible to possess, cultivate and use marijuana with a doctor's note. Medical marijuana dispensaries grew in number, and more patients utilized their services, but not without fear of Drug Enforcement Agency Raids -- a reality stretching into this year. Recently,patients have been offered consolation that medical marijuana usage is being protected, and that the stigmas surrounding it -- for medical purposes and otherwise -- are on a path to eradication.

On February 27, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Drug Enforcement Agency would stop raiding medical marijuana dispensaries in the 13 states--California included--where they are legal.  This followed San Francisco Supervisor Tom Ammiano's proposal for the  Marijuana Control, Regulation and Education Act--better known simply as California Assembly Bill 390 --which would effectively legalize the sale and use of marijuana by anyone over the age of 21 in California.

These landmark decisions and proposals signify the closure of a 13-year struggle over two previous presidential administrations which took stances against medical marijuana, despite what individual states ruled. Soon after voters voiced their preferences on Prop. 215, the Clinton administration fought the law, winning a Supreme Court case that granted the federal government power to shut down any non-profit organizations that supplied medical marijuana. The administration also unsuccessfully attempted to punish California doctors that recommended medical marijuana to patients.

Under the Bush administration, federal agents began raiding medical marijuana dispensaries and growers, using drug laws to persecute suppliers. DEA officials have even written to dispensaries' landlords threatening to forfeit their property unless they give their tenants the boot. Bush may have been a proponent of states' rights, but only when they fit his agenda: During this time, the administration was successful in shutting down 30 dispensaries that were legal under state law.

Now, Holder's announcement marks a partial victory for California --  the full one which lies in the complete legalization of marijuana. Patients may be able to use medical marijuana with more ease now, but it is not until its full legalization that their use, and its acceptance, can become widespread. Many cities in California still do not allow dispensaries.

As some skeptics say, maybe that's for a good reason. Still, the Institute of Medicine, run by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, has concluded that while marijuana is by no means a cure for any disease, it can curb nausea, pain, anxiety and appetite loss. While studies are inconclusive (maybe because the Bush administration did everything it could to block FDA-approved research), no adverse side effects have been proven from moderate use.

California already has more than 120 legal medical marijuana dispensaries, 31 which are in Ammiano's city of San Francisco. In addition to aiding patients, these would help the money-lacking Golden State considering that Ammiano's proposal includes a $50 per ounce tax. When dispensaries don't have to recoup the costs of DEA raids, perhaps they will even have more to spend on supplies for what will be a likely increasing clientele. As an added bonus, any money raised from taxation will -- as the title of the bill connotes -- support drug education and awareness.

A recent CBS News/New York Times poll unveiled that 41 percent of Americans favor legalization. While that's not quite a majority, it shows that the times are a-changing, as the numbers were at 34 percent in a 2002 CNN/Time Poll.

With the current wave of government actions and proposals, those numbers stand to increase even more in the future. Now is the ideal time -- under a new, more lax administration and a concrete, logically constructed proposal -- for California to stake its course again as a progressive leader and trendsetter. Especially with the passage of California Assembly Bill 390, California can eradicate the taboo from responsible marijuana use, and benefit users and the state in the process.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Legally Erasing Stigmas about Medical Marijuana

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us