Skip to content
Subscribe

Left’s Attacks on Limbaugh Unlikely to Make a Difference

Published:
rush_limbaugh

The left has gone bonkers over Rush Limbaugh’s attack on a woman who testified on family planning and birth control at a recent Congressional hearing, and the mild self-rebuke that followed.  Limbaugh called the woman a slut and a prostitute for her willingness to deal with intimate, personal issues such as contraception.

There is glee across the left end of the web because some of Rush’s sponsors have pulled out of his program, and there seems to be a belief that his demise is near.

Websites such as Credo Action and Left Action are proclaiming an apocalyptic collapse of all things Rush as a result of the brouhaha.

“Enough is enough,” wrote Left Action.  “It is time for Rush Limbaugh's sponsors to stop supporting his hate speech through their advertising dollars.”

And from the Credo Action website:

“The backlash has been so great that even after doubling down in defense of his reprehensible comments, Limbaugh was forced to issue a rare -- and totally insufficient -- apology stating ‘my choice of words was not the best’."

The reality is likely to be quite different from the left’s doom and gloom perspective because Rush retains a huge and loyal radio audience and wields considerable influence over the political right and the Republican Party.

This issue stemmed from hearings on contraception and the right of religious institutions to refuse to supply contraceptives based on their moral principles.  The hearings, held by Representative Darrell Issa (R-CA), famously featured only men in its initial panel.  One woman who sought the opportunity to testify – Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke –was rejected by Issa, but was invited to testify at a subsequent Democratic hearing on the same subject.

After her testimony supporting access to free or low-cost contraceptives through any medical provider, Fluke was attacked by Limbaugh with these words:

"What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute... She wants to be paid to have sex. She's having so much sex she can't afford the contraception."

Limbaugh has since made the following apology:

“For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.”

Credo Action proudly proclaimed, “Since we started our campaign, several major advertisers have pulled their support from the Rush Limbaugh Show.”  Those advertisers include LegalZoom, Quicken Loans and Sleep Number, according to ABC News.

There is no question that Limbaugh’s description of Ms. Fluke was horrendous.  But the reality is that a radio show as popular as Rush Limbaugh’s likely has a backlog of advertisers ready to replace those who have departed.  In addition, once this dust-up has subsided, major advertisers who have jumped ship are likely to return.  The chances that this event will be fatal or even seriously damaging to the Rush Limbaugh Show seem remote.  Fans of Limbaugh will not take his tepid apology seriously, and Rush is unlikely to change his style, politics or approach enough for anyone to notice a difference.

In fact, it is a sign of Limbaugh’s authority in the political arena that the left has reacted so strongly.  Rather than weaken him, the left's attacks strengthen his hand and increase his influence with an audience that already distrusts liberalism and is unlikely to feel outrage by his comments.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Left’s Attacks on Limbaugh Unlikely to Make a Difference

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us