Skip to content
Subscribe

Latest Field Poll gauges pulse of California voters

Published:

Despite some modest gains in positive sentiment from California’s voters in certain areas, the latest Field poll indicates that the state still has a long road ahead on the path to recovery.

Party-aligned voters weighed in on Governor Brown’s performance. As expected, party sentiment is polarized when it comes to evaluating him. 64% of Democrats said that they approve of the governor’s  performance while 20% disapprove. Among Republicans, 59% disapprove of the governor’s performance while 24% approve.

Interestingly enough- among those not identifying with any party- slightly more unaffiliated voters disapprove of the California governor according to the latest survey.  Sentiment about him within this circle is just about evenly split- 39% approve and 42% disapprove.

Ideological groups reflect a similar pattern found among party-aligned voters. The poll found that more conservative voters tend to rate Brown very negatively while those that identify as more liberal tended to hold the opposite sentiment. The same pattern was seen with liberal and conservative moderates as well.

There is some good news for Governor Brown among those ideologically classifying themselves as middle-of-the-road voters- 47% approve of the governor while only 31% disapprove. Also noted by Field is that there are relatively high percentages of voters who aren’t able to offer an opinion of his performance- in the 16% to 19% range.

Among California’s voters overall, the governor holds a 45% approval to 38% disapproval edge. Since March 2011, however, Brown’s approval rating has slipped in the course of Field’s four previous surveys on the matter.

Republicans, Democrats, and non-partisans also all overwhelmingly continue to give the legislature a poor job performance rating. Overall, one in five Californians continues to give it very poor marks. In other words, only 22% of the state’s voters approve of the job that lawmakers are doing. Field notes that voters have been highly negative of the legislature for the past four years and have given them more negative marks than positive in the last ten years.

On the issue of a part-time legislature, Republicans and non-partisans side together pretty closely. Support from the former is 49% and the latter is at 45%. Democrats, by a majority, oppose the idea. Overall, 45% of voters oppose the measure while 39% support it.

Looking ahead, despite an eleven point increase in the number of voters who think the state is going in the right direction, there’s still  62% who say that California is going in the wrong direction. On this issue, large majorities of Republicans and non-partisans agree that the state is on the wrong track while Democrats are more split on the issue.

One significant takeaway from these latest findings is that voters aligned with either of the two parties continue to recognize that- under the current political leadership- the Golden State is headed down the wrong path. If that's not admitted explicitly, it's certainly a result that's observed in this and in other surveys.

Another takeaway is that non-partisan voters, and even the ones classified middle-of-the-road, are becoming more of a part of the conversation about California’s future. The noted rise of Independents, along with the decline of the two major parties in California, should certainly challenge lawmakers to get their acts together and produce legitimate results.

This latest Field survey was conducted February 2-18, 2012 among a random sample of 1,003 registered voters in California. Interviewing was conducted by telephone. Some questions were asked to a random sample of 488 or 515 voters. The maximum sampling error for the overall samples was +/- 3.1% and had a 95% confidence level.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Latest Field Poll gauges pulse of California voters

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us