Skip to content
Subscribe

Knight Capital Should Receive Time-out for Trading Errors

Published:

1 millisecond snapshot of trading algorithm gone mad with prices ping-ponging upwards. Credit: zerohedge.com

The recent debacle with Knight Capital, where they apparently rushed an untested new trading algorithm to market without rigorous testing first, caused the company to lose $400 million in just a few minutes. The stock market reacted by going higher because the trading platform was pushing prices higher (even as it lost money on each trade) until market circuit breakers were tripped, and the NYSE pulled the plug.

If a child is bad, he is given a time-out and put somewhere isolated to calm down. If you drive your car in a lunatic manner, your license can and should be suspended. Trading firms who recklessly wreak havoc on the markets with untested programs should be punished in the same way. As much as possible, they should simply be banned from trading until they prove they, and their computer programs can act like responsible adults.

Zero Hedge gives a sense of what these computer programs, which make thousands of trades a second unburdened by human intervention, can do when they run amok.

Over and over and over and over. As Nanex laconically notes, "In the case of EXC [Excelon trades], that means losing about 15 cents on every pair of trades. Do that 40 times a second, 2400 times a minute, and you now have a system that's very efficient at burning money."

Multiply that by the 150 other stocks that Knight is a market maker in and you get a sense of the tremendous damages that can be done in just a few minutes to the stock market and to the trading company itself. Instead of an efficient market we have something more resembling a bipolar train wreck, and a super-quick way to burn money.

The stock price for Knight promptly dropped off a cliff and the predator became the prey. As Forbes says:

Company is stupid enough to bet its future on untested software. Company duly loses its entire market cap by buying high and selling low. Company, no doubt, gets bought out for peanuts and asset-stripped in short order.

Congresswoman Maxine Waters of California says this debacle shows the need for more government regulation and intervention. Forbes thinks this is nonsense. I tend to agree. If the best and brightest programmers on Wall Street make a blunder of this magnitude, and management rushes the product out the door before it has been properly tested, it’s difficult to see how the federal government would be able to help.

But what the government could do is mandate time-outs for trading firms who make colossal and stupid mistakes. For example, Knight Capital screwed up; they get banned from trading for six months.  Just the threat of this would make companies be vastly more careful.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Knight Capital Should Receive Time-out for Trading Errors

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us