Skip to content
Subscribe

Iowa takes the political spotlight

Published:

The Iowa caucuses take place tomorrow.  What’s fascinating about this often-called “irrelevant” stop on the Republican primary parade is that it may end up highly significant if not decisive for the current field of candidates.

That’s because the Iowa caucus vote is threatening to turn the Republican primary battle from chaos to calmness.  If the results line up with the polls at the moment, the most competitive candidate against the President – Mitt Romney – may come out victorious.  Ron Paul seems likely to finish a solid second, perhaps even win.  A number of weaker candidates, including Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, appear to have badly faded, while Rick Santorum appears to have consolidated his hold on the evangelical vote.  And the Newt Gingrich fireworks display has dimmed in the light of day.

Going into New Hampshire, Romney could actually consolidate his hold on the nomination and coast all the way to the convention.  After months of confusion, the Republicans have begun to look controlled and focused.  For awhile there, they almost seemed like Democrats in their chaos and confusion.  And while some polls have Romney in a dead heat for the lead with Paul and Santorum, the large percentage of undecided voters (approximately 40 percent according to the most recent polling) may well break for the candidate who many seem to believe has the best chance to win in November – Mitt Romney.

Iowa hardly seems like the ideal setting to clarify the Republican situation, but it may turn out to be just that.  The pundits say that Iowa’s population is not representative of the nation as a whole and that the caucus process doesn’t even represent the typical Republican voter.  But this has been a hard-fought primary with enough lead changes to satisfy even a horse race fan.  The drama surrounding Newt Gingrich’s remarkable up and down performance, the re-surfacing a Rick Santorum, and the Ron Paul wave have made Iowa more than it might have been, and have made the results significant.

Iowa’s first-in-the-nation position may have gained some relevance this year.  Its Republican caucus-goers won’t be surprised.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Iowa takes the political spotlight

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us