Skip to content
Subscribe

The Internet Reacts to Lion Killer -- And Probably Ruins His Life

Published:

The recent killing of the beloved lion Cecil in Zimbabwe by American dentist Walter J. Palmer has sparked an uprising on social media, with renewed calls to ban trophy hunting from people across the globe.

If you've been on Twitter for more than 30 seconds over the last couple of days, it’s almost certain you've seen at least one tweet about Cecil. It’s even more likely that the comment spoke negatively about Palmer.

As a result of the collective and socially-driven hatred toward Palmer, there are over 800,000 - yes, that is almost a million - signatures on an online petition demanding justice for Cecil.

The Yelp page for Palmer's business is literally obliterated with hate toward him, and even his kittens.

The negative reviews are multiplying faster than Yelp can delete them, with many users complaining about Yelp's attempt to delete content "not relevant" to the business.

Joseph M writes: "Yelp should not be deleting negative reviews. People are sharing information about this practitioner which is useful to prospective clients. This is the entire premise of Yelp - people helping other people to make educated decisions about where to shop, eat, stay and purchase goods and services. In this case, people are letting other people know that the business owner is a someone who poaches wild animals."

On Facebook, people are just as mad, with the "Shame Lion Killer Dr Walter Palmer and River Bluff Dental" Facebook Page receiving more than 24,000 likes in one day.

If this happened 20 years ago, no one would know about his involvement in the lion's death unless Palmer publicly told them. No one outside of his town would know about it unless Palmer advertised it on TV, newspapers, or in a magazine. In other words, in a world without the Internet, Palmer would have control over who knew about his hunt.

Walter Palmer, who just days ago exerted his own power over Cecil, is now left powerless. The Internet has stripped him of his power to control the message, and he is now experiencing the ever-fierce wrath of the Internet. They decide whether or not a story is worth reading, worth commenting on, or worth sharing with their friends. They control the message.

In an age of social media, the power lies with the masses.

Photo Credit: Brent Staplekamp

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

The Internet Reacts to Lion Killer -- And Probably Ruins His Life

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us