Skip to content
Subscribe

Illinois Independent Candidate Sues over Stringent Ballot Access Laws

Published:

In Illinois' 13th district, one candidate is suing over the constitutionality of the onerous signature requirements for independent candidates.

Republican U.S. Rep. Rodney Davis, first elected in 2012, currently represents the 13th district. Shortly after submitting his petition signatures, both Republicans and Democrats filed objections against independent David Gill. Gill ran unsuccessfully for elected office four previous times as a Democrat. This year, however, he is running as an independent.

As a candidate who shares similar positions with Vermont U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, Gill could draw support away from Democratic challenger Mark Wicklund.

In response to the objections from the major parties, the Illinois State Board of Elections ruled that Gill lacked the necessary 10,754 signatures to qualify for the ballot. They ruled valid only 8,600 of Gill's signatures.

The boundary of the district likely led to the numerous invalid signatures. The 13th splits through different cities and counties, creating confusion among signature gatherers and voters alike.

A key component of the Gill lawsuit is the issue of signatures necessary for independent candidates to accumulate. Compared to Gill, Davis and Wicklund required fewer than 800 valid signatures each to qualify.

Gill and his lawyer Sam Cahnman say the signature threshold independent candidates must meet is "severe and overly burdensome." According to the lawsuit, only three independent candidates since 1890 have ever surpassed the 10,754 signatures Gill needed. None were in Illinois.

The lawsuit challenges the five percent requirement for independent candidates to meet. Independents need valid signatures equal to five percent of the people who voted in the previous congressional election.

Additionally, Illinois election law has varying requirements independent candidates must meet depending on the office they seek. Independent House candidates require substantially more signatures than independent Senate candidates.

According to Gill's lawsuit:

"There is no rational relationship to proportionally require three times more signatures for an independent US Representative than an independent Senator candidate (compared to requirement for established party candidates for the same office), when a US Representative holds much less power (one of 435 vs. one of 100); serves one-third as many years (2 years vs. 6 years), and represents one-18th as many people (18 congressional districts in Illinois)."

The Illinois State Board of Elections will meet on August 26 to determine the final ballot and the status of independent David Gill on it.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Illinois Independent Candidate Sues over Stringent Ballot Access Laws

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us