Skip to content

WATCH: The Real History Behind the Debate Commission's 15% Rule

Published:

We over at Third Candidates took a look at the controversial debate access criteria that has been criticized for keeping third party and independent candidates out the important presidential debates.

We spoke with political experts, the authors of this criteria - the Commission on Presidential Debates, and critics who claim that the criteria is intentionally unfair to keep out competitive, non-major party candidates. While Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson and Green Party candidate Jill Stein polling at historic numbers for third party candidates, they are still being denied entry into the first debate. Needless to say, this rule is as relevant as ever.

Our next episode of Third Candidates will take a look at the hurdles non-major party candidates face when trying to get on state ballots, and a possible reform that's on the ballot in Maine this November that could eliminate the 'spoiler' effect -- Ranked Choice Voting.

Editor's note: To learn more about the Third Candidates project or how you can help keep it going, follow the team at Seed & Spark and Facebook to get updates.

Jake Simms

I’m just a guy with a camera and an editing machine that set out to look into politics in the 2016 election for a project: Third Candidates.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.