Skip to content
Subscribe

High-Stakes Virginia Election to be Decided by Name Drawing

Published:

It’s been a dramatic week in the race to fill the 94th District seat in Virginia’s House of Delegates. After the initial tabulation from the Nov. 7 election, incumbent David Yancy (R) led challenger Shelly Simonds (D) by just 10 votes (a margin of 0.0419 percent).

During an unofficial recount on Dec. 19, Simonds gained 17 votes while Yancy gained 6, potentially reversing the outcome and leaving Simonds with a mere one-vote lead.

The following day, a three judge panel in Newport News ruled that one of the ballots left uncounted should have gone to Yancy, leaving the race tied at 11,608 to 11,608.

Under Virginia law, the tie will be resolved by lot, so the outcome could be decided by drawing a name from a hat.

The 94th District race is a rare occasion where a recount could change the result of an election because the initial tally was so close. The gap of just 10 votes, or 0.0419 percent, is extremely close to the average margin shift FairVote found in statewide races with less than one million votes: 0.039 percent., which found that “ecounts in elections with more voters altered the vote margin by lower percentages than recounts in elections with fewer voters.”

Even that average probably doesn’t accurately represent races like this one, since much fewer votes are generally cast in state legislative district races than in the statewide races examined in FairVote’s report

The data show that a recount of a close race in the 94th District will be more favorable to a candidate hoping to change the outcome than one would be in race with a larger electorate, like Atlanta (or Alabama).

Whichever candidate’s name is drawn will decide more than who will represent the 94th District in the Virginia House of Delegates. A Yancy victory would allow the Republicans to maintain control of the chamber by the barest of majorities (51-49). A Simonds win would leave it evenly split between Republicans and Democrats (50-50).

A tie would require Republicans and Democrats to enter into a power-sharing agreement in order for the House of Delegates to operate.

FairVote and the Bipartisan Policy Center have studied similar situations in other state legislatures and produced a set of recommendations for how evenly-divided legislatures can continue to function through bipartisan cooperation. Legislators in Virginia may want to take note.

Editor's Note: This article, written by David O'Brien, originally published on FairVote's blog and has been modified slightly for publication on IVN.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

High-Stakes Virginia Election to be Decided by Name Drawing

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us