Skip to content
Subscribe

He Won't Be Back

Published:

With the governorship up for grabs in 2010 and a wildly unpopular incumbent in office, Democrats in California have substantial reason for rejoicing and Republicans are stuck with explaining how it wasn't actually their fault that said unpopular leader got into office.

Matters were complicated by the fact that until recently, the menace of having Schwarzenegger as a candidate for senator (or, God forbid, governor) hung like a pall over the GOP's 2010 strategy, which in turn made running from the former Governator even more difficult.

Not anymore. The Los Angeles Times reports that Governor Schwarzenegger has officially taken himself out of the running for anything, claiming "When I say I'm not running for anything, that's exactly what I mean . . . until you change the Constitution."

Translation: Until I can run for president.

So farewell Arnold. If nothing else, your critics will forever mourn the countless Predator, Terminator and Total Recall jokes they could have made.

But those critics, at least on the Right, are now hastily making their opposition as loud as possible. Indeed, Schwarzenegger's removal of himself from California politics has now produced a veritable GOP feeding frenzy. Last week's Los Angeles Times reports that "By criticizing his painstakingly crafted budget, actively opposing several of his ballot measures and, more subtly, jabbing at his work habits and ego, [GOP Gubernatorial Candidates] Meg Whitman and Steve Poizner are striving to distance themselves from the unpopular Schwarzenegger and tap widespread GOP anger over the incumbent's broken pledge not to raise taxes."

This is a difficult sell at the best of times, but there may be reasons for cautious optimism among Republican voters. To begin, nobody can accuse the current GOP legislative leadership of selling out to Schwarzenegger. As far back as January, GOP legislative leader Mike Villines made it clear that his party would not support the massive expansion of taxes Schwarzenegger's proposed budget included, and arguably made more noise about stopping the budget than the Democrats, who weren't even in the same party as the governor. The passage of the budget was stalled for ages in Sacramento as the GOP mercilessly held the Democrats up and forced concession after concession, finally ending with the defection of Democrat-in-waiting Abel Maldonado.

Even Rush Limbaugh threw in an "Attaboy" to the legislative Republicans, saying "I wanted to take some time here to applaud them.  It's not easy being a Republican in California.  It's especially not easy being a Republican in the legislature out there, and they're holding fast." And all this was against a budget drafted by a governor from their own party. Needless to say, the GOP is hardly stuck in the same place as they were with...that other unpopular political leader.

Still, the GOP will have a hard time convincing voters of its good intentions come 2010, especially considering their unpleasant (and undeserved) reputation as the "party of No," which Democrats have been trying gleefully to affix at the national level. Whitman and Poizner will need alternative solutions, some of which may be politically inconvenient, but necessary. California's Gubernatorial race will constitute a repudiation of Schwarzenegger either way, but for the GOP's sake, let's hope it's a repudiation of how far Schwarzenegger went in the wrong direction, rather than a flooring of the gas pedal in the ride down the Road to Serfdom.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

He Won't Be Back

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us