Skip to content
Subscribe

Harsh Medicine

Published:

The impending budget cataclysm, having drawn all the politicalcourage it possibly can out of California's politicians, has now begunproducing the much-less-desirable opposite reaction: namely, panic.

Capitol Weekly, the self-proclaimed newspaper of California Governmentand Politics, has a story on the most recent gimmick proposed by Governor Schwarzenegger to shave money off the budget. According to the story, Schwarzenegger has "called on thefederal district court to immediately terminate itsprison health-care receivership, saying that the court-appointedreceiver forced an ill-advised, $8 billion spending program on thestrapped state inviolation of federal law."

Theimmediate impulse is to say, "Thank Heaven", as the closer the stategets to implementing unnecessary humanitarian projects the better, andindeed, the program in questionought not to have ever existed. But a gimmick, necessary or not, isstill a gimmick, and one should be wary of allowing theatrical gesturestoward fiscal responsibility to obscure the encroaching catastrophe.Moreover, the extended legal battle which is likely to ensue as aresult of Schwarzenegger's defiance is arguably even more undesirablethan the $8 billion. Given that this is a specifically legalbattle, Schwarzenegger ought to be especially wary, since a vote fromCalifornia's people would arguably be much more friendly than a rulingfrom one of the most liberal circuit courts in the country.

Of course, there is a much less contentious and far more useful program which the governor could terminate, but to do so would swiftly terminate the accolades he is currently receiving from the press -- that is, those elements of the pressthat don't understand economics. I refer, naturally, to the anti-globalwarming regulations President Obama gaveSchwarzenegger the green light (no pun intended) to enforce uponCalifornia's unsuspecting population. The Schwarzenegger who isdefending these regulations, probably passed solely for the purpose ofgetting on the good side of California's Democrats, is a throwback tothe Schwarzenegger of old, citing bipartisan concerns for the sake oflooking enlightened and like the sort of person who could fit in at aSan Francisco social function.

Unfortunately, as one often has to point out, the reality isinfinitely less glamorous. Stephen Moore, the senior economics writerfor The Wall Street Journal, has writtenthat "since 2007 -- in anticipation of the new mandates -- Californiahas led the nation in job losses." The "mandates" in question are thenew global warming regulations which are, in theory, supposed to createnew, "green" jobs. However, given Mr. Moore's words, these jobs areonly "green" insofar as they ought to induce seasickness inCalifornia's workers.

Scholarly studies on the subject paint a similarly alarmingpicture. Robert Bradley Jr., the president of the Institute for EnergyResearch in Houston, Texas, and an adjunct scholar of the CatoInstitute, has written a studyentitled "Renewable Energy: Not Cheap, not 'Green'" in which he pointsout that what he refers to as "eco-energy planning" (the sort oftactics Schwarzenegger is using) face "three major obstacles": theabsence of "renewable energy options,"  the fact that "renewable energysubsidies and mandatory energy conservation are proving to beincompatible with a competitive restructuring of the electricityindustry because of unfavorable economics and surplus existingcapacity" and the fact that "economic and environmental advances in thefossil-fuels industry, particularly in the use of natural gas inelectricity generation and reformulated gasoline in transportation havereduced the environmental costs of fossil-fuel consumption necessary tojustify subsidized alternatives to fossil fuels."

On the basis of thesethree objections, Schwarzenegger ought to cut the exhorbitant fundingthat will be necessary to keep these programs going, which will alsostimulate California's economy by aiding business expectations aboutthe future of the economy, which surely cannot afford another shock ontop of its current budget problems.

This is the moment, in short, when Schwarzenegger will show himselfeither to be a seasoned leader or just another green amateurpolitician.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Harsh Medicine

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us