Skip to content
Subscribe

Haiti charity becomes excuse for tax code manipulation by Congress

By Indy
Published:

Earlier this week I was reading AB 347, a bill that is currently circulating in Washington DC. The summary reads as follows:  "Allows an individual or a corporate taxpayer to deduct a charitable contribution made for the relief of victims of the earthquake in Haiti on the taxpayer's 2009 tax return, instead of the 2010 tax return."

I am a supporter of charitable giving.  As a matter of fact I am the president of a non-profit corporation.  However, playing with taxes in this manner is, in my opinion, playing with fire.  Our nation already operates under a budget that is out of step with reality.  We have existing tax laws for charitable donations.  Does this bill serve any purpose other than to make the person(s) sponsoring it "look good" in an election year?  I don’t think so.



The current tax code is hundreds of pages long and wastes $200 billion a year on tax code compliance.  Now we're going to spend additional tax dollars on getting a jump-start on 2010 donations?



Where in the Constitution is the authority to offer aid to foreign nations though manipulations of US tax code derived?  Is it altruism if your motivation is the manipulation of a tax return?  How does it benefit all citizens as "fair and honest taxation"?  How would this bill improve the "general welfare" of the United States?  How does this bill address the already out-of-control deficit?



How about we set up a tax bill that will offer deductions to people who donate to "reduce the deficit" this year?



Does Haiti need our help? Yes.  That fact is unquestionable.  However, we should not be manipulating our tax code to provide that aid.  Millions of dollars are flowing into Haiti regardless of this bill.  It boils down to more pointless legislation.



When Congress uses its power to change existing tax codes in order to boost re-election campaigns and popularity (in the name of altruism), suddenly changes to the financial structure of our nation are based on whim - not law.  With precedents such as this, what is to stop Congress from passing a change to the tax code, which will exempt them from paying taxes altogether?



I urge you to contact your Congressional representatives and suggest they spend their time and energy fixing what we have first.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Haiti charity becomes excuse for tax code manipulation by Congress

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us