Skip to content
Subscribe

Gay marriage may become 'no big deal' in the distant future

Published:

A few years ago, at the height of his popularity, Tiger Woods had become the beige template for humanity.  His fall from grace has done little to push that idea into the background as racially-mixed athletes, performers, academics and executives seem omnipresent in our lives.  The malevolence of what used to be called "mongrelization" has transmuted itself into the vigor of diversity.

Another of those transformations -- long underway in our society -- was kicked well past the "apparent" role into greater cultural normalization this past weekend when New York became the largest population center in the USA to legalize same-sex marriage.  While the State of New York may be behind the curve of the City of San Francisco in some affairs (and who isn't? Take that, pet stores), it appears to be more socially progressive than California's so-called liberal legislature and its secular Democratic governor.  New York's Roman Catholic Governor Andrew Cuomo was the driving force behind the legalization of gay marriage in the Empire State, and his nearly silent partner was Ken Mehlman, who exited the closet after serving as chair of the Republican National Committee.

If you've ever pondered how all of this will look to future societies, the Onion, which bills itself as "the world's greatest news source," is happy to oblige with its usual satire.  In an article entitled "Future U.S. History Students: 'It's Pretty Embarrassing How Long You Guys Took To Legalize Gay Marriage'" and dated from the year 2083, the Onion makes unsubtle allusions to the civil rights era by having one student born in the 2060s ask "I mean was everybody just a huge bigot back then or what?"  Inspecting their history texts, the high school kids want to know why self-proclaimed believers in gays rights such as Presidents Clinton and Obama, and political leaders such as Senators McCain and Kerry could oppose the obvious Constitutional rights of citizens just to get re-elected?

Back in today's world, progressives are thrilled with New York's decision on gay marriage, while conservatives are of mixed minds.  For example, the libertarian-minded Ron Paul has argued for years that the business of marriage is a private issue among consenting adults that should not be defined or regulated by the government, particularly the federal government.  The religious right has made the so-called homosexual agenda a litmus test for the backing of any candidate.  But a handful of middle-ground Republicans tipped the scales in New York and may have started a geographic movement that appears likely to eventually cross the nation from right to left, as opposed to the usual opposite direction.

Meanwhile, many on the far left have grown impatient with President Obama's unwillingness to take a clear stand in favor of same-sex marriage, while the Justice Department's decision to step away from prosecutions under the Defense of Marriage Act created a minor brouhaha on conservative talk radio and within the far right earlier this year.

Even in the future envisioned by the Onion, some societal change was too much.  According to the fictional article, they were struggling through their own "big controversial issues, like marrying your clone."

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Gay marriage may become 'no big deal' in the distant future

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us