Skip to content
Subscribe

Is Gary Johnson Democracy’s Safety Valve?

Published:

So the conventions are finally behind us now. Thanks be to God, humanity, or whatever deity you prefer. Both parties have finished making their cases for why their anointed candidate should be the next president of the United States of America. Yet as I write this — just under a hundred days from Election Day— we remain very, very far from united.

It’s been an odd few weeks as the partisans tried desperately to explain why we should use “least worst logic” to ignore all the deep flaws within their candidate.

How messed up is that?

Honestly, how many would choose to board a rocket that had just a few major flaws, but supposedly wasn’t as bad as the one already on fire?

We need another moon landing, not a disaster on the launchpad! This presidential cycle is clearly not the best America has to offer. Every sane person out there knows we can do better.

Whether we like it or not though, politics today remains a reflection of us as a nation. Even those that choose to sit out on the polls. So try this exercise, find a picture of your current candidate of choice and look at it as you would a mirror. Then ask yourself — is this really who I am?

103477256-trumphillary2rr.530x298

If the answer is “no,” or even “not exactly,” then you are probably part of the 91% of Americans that did not choose Trump or Hillary as a candidate. That’s right, only 9% of our nation is responsible for the illusion of choice that we have today.

In 2016, we can destroy that illusion. Whether you are a progressive that got Berned by party politics or a conservative that refuses to get in line behind a truly unhinged candidate, Gary Johnson offers an incredibly unique opportunity.

Right now, this is not about swearing to vote for him come November (remember, we still have almost 100 days). It is also not thinking he has to win the popular vote or even the electoral college. It is about denying the party machines from insisting that we have no other choice but to accept what they have to offer.

If the duopoly were to split most states and Johnson won just enough to ensure no one had a majority of electoral votes, the 12th Amendment would throw the decision to the House of Representatives. In the House each state gets just one vote, which means that the entire game changes.

This does not automatically mean Gary Johnson would become president, but given how many establishment players see Trump as a the death of their party and the frequent disagreements he has with House Speaker Paul Ryan, Gary Johnson represents the perfect safety valve.

As the House stands today, 33 states are majority Republican, 14 are Majority Democrat, and 3 are tied. It will take 33 states to form the required majority. If Johnson were to win a red state like Utah — where he is already closing in on Trump — he could easily tip the balance. This would then force both parties to do something they have failed to do for almost a decade now — compromise.

By recognizing Johnson as a credible threat, we can secure him a spot in the debates. Once in the debates, millions of Americans that have never heard of him will get a chance to learn why Gary may just be the best thing to happen to politics in 156 years.

Johnson’s place in the debates would open the door to winning the entire election outright. In an age where 88 million eligible voters have given up on casting a ballot, Gary has the chance to represent far more than just hope for or belief in change. He is the change.

Forget what you have ever heard about the Libertarian party. With millions of new members flooding in, it will become completely refined. By combining the best aspects of fiscally conservative and socially liberal thinking, the Libertarian party can modernize itself into a truly powerful alternative to the two party dinosaurs. It is time America.

Election after election, we have watched helplessly as partisan bickering rose ever higher and louder. In Congress, nothing meaningful is accomplished when members spend 100 percent of their time fighting and raising money for the next election. We need not be helpless anymore though. There is more than just an illusion of choice. We have a third choice this time and it will be on the ballot in all 50 states.

We desperately need a paradigm shift. The decline of a party representing “cranky old white people” and the rise of a modern alternative to represent millennials and the millions of disenfranchised would be incredibly healthy for representative democracy. If you have given up on voting or never thought your vote would count, 2016 is your chance.

Learn more at JohnsonWeld. #LiveFree America, it is how we were meant to be.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Is Gary Johnson Democracy’s Safety Valve?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us