Skip to content
Subscribe

Gallup: Congressional Candidates Face Split Electorate

Published:
independent_voters_ap

Despite the narrative that the Republican presidential field faces trouble from disgruntled voters in an election year, the bloody political campaign doesn’t seem to have negatively affected congressional Republicans who are also being gauged by constituents.

A recent Gallup poll indicates that congressional Republicans have climbed back into a competitive status with their Democratic colleagues for a November showdown. That’s reflected in the current sentiment of the nation’s registered voters and it’s a contrast from where the congressional Republicans were with voters just a few months ago.

As it turns out, U.S. registered voters are now currently split on whether they’ll be voting for a Republican or a Democrat in their congressional districts this fall. The latest figures show that 47% of polled voters say that they would vote for either the Republican or Democratic Party’s candidate if the election was today. Only 6% of voters are undecided on the matter.

Gallup asked the following question to a randomly sample of 1,014 adults, aged 18 and older living in the United States and the District of Columbia: “If the elections for Congress were being held today, which party’s candidate would you vote for in your congressional district--[ROTATE] the Democratic Party’s candidate or the Republican Party’s candidate?”

In August- a time when the same question was posed to a sample of the nation's voters- Democrats held a larger advantage with those who said that they would vote for a candidate from the party. Within that period, a majority 51% said they would vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate while 44% said they would vote for the Republican Party candidate. By December-the last time Gallup conducted the survey- the advantage held by Democrats shrunk with only 49% of voters siding with them while 45% sided with Republicans.

Since last summer, it appears that the GOP has gained at least some momentum. The bigger picture, however, is the significance for the nation’s Independent voters.

With Gallup’s congressional ballot measure being tied, the organization’s analysis takes a hold of notion that these latest numbers “underscore the divided nature of the political landscape in America.”

In other words, the numbers are another manifestation a divided electorate. By some accounts, polarization is intensifying now more than ever and it’s a concern constantly highlighted by Independent voters.

Ultimately, however, current gridlock is not a circumstance over which Independents need to distress- especially at this crucial time. As the last few polls on the subject of congressional support have demonstrated, one political party may not enjoy the preference of the electorate for long. It can change in a matter of months.

In all plausibility, these very shifts in supporting one party or another in the polls could be due in part to the growing influence of Independents. They’re the ones becoming an integral part of the political process. After all, it’s their numbers continue to expand while the growth of two main political parties pale by comparison.

Unlike previous times, by virtue of their exploding growth, Independents matter now more than ever in a polarized environment.

With momentum in favor of electing congressional Republicans in this latest Gallup poll, the political landscape may be changing in their advantage for now. In the time of an ailing economy- one which Gallup measures at 9.1% unemployment and at 19% underemployment- it’s not an advantage that will hold stable unless there’s a solid message to keep Independents on their side.

This latest Gallup poll is based on telephone interviews conducted February 16-19, 2012. It had a 95% rate of confidence and maximum margin of error of +/- 4 percentage points.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Gallup: Congressional Candidates Face Split Electorate

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us