Skip to content
Subscribe

Does California's Cal-ACCESS Upgrade Improve Transparency?

Published:

On August 28, California's Secretary of State, Debra Bowen, obliged calls from organizations like California Common Cause, Maplight, and others to make additional campaign finance information available online. The agency agreed to upgrade Califonia's Cal-ACCESS campaign finance search system in May, but only after a lengthy lobbying effort from transparency advocates.

Earlier this year, Bowen cited the Online Disclosure Act of 1997 as cause for concern in releasing complete campaign finance data. The act prohibits disclosing political donors’ addresses online, a policy which Bowen argued would require too great a dedication of resources on the agency's part to implement.

Nevertheless, shortly after the update to Cal-ACCESS was implemented, Maplight released a Beta version of their Power Search tool wherein journalists and others can sift through the mountains of California campaign finance filings by political action group, donor, elected official, and more (void of personal addresses). Power Search offers considerably more in the way of search customization and user-friendliness.

Alongside the launch, Maplight's co-founder and president, Daniel G. Newman, said:

"With the influence of campaign money far too pervasive in our government, we commend Secretary Bowen for working with the public to make it easier to see the forces influencing California’s lawmakers."

In a release, Bowen was also optimistic about what impact the new Cal-ACCESS would have on future California elections.

"Following the money in politics and government is essential for making informed decisions at the ballot box," she stated.

Cal-ACCESS was searchable mainly via segregated portals or a one-dimensional keyword search prior to the upgrade, thus rendering a comprehensive search of candidate and political donors unintuitive to say the least. What remains questionable is how useful the new tools will be.

Although the Power Search tool is still in Beta and new features will be made available, it is likely to be used by a minority of journalists and tech-savvy citizens. Though the upgrade may make the window into special interest influence on California's politics slightly less opaque, it remains an alluring prospect for political watchers to presume influence based on these new tools without considering the human element.

As Allan Zaremberg, president for the California Chamber of Commerce, commented earlier this year on California's political environment, “Money is corruptible, but it’s the people, I think the people who are leaders… They’re the ones who determine whether or not money corrupts them.”

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Does California's Cal-ACCESS Upgrade Improve Transparency?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us