Skip to content
Subscribe

Debate heats up over Top Two Primary

Published:

A new poll and multiple op-eds are placing the 2010 Top Two Open Primary ballot initiative in the spotlight.  The latest Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) poll revealed that 47% of likely voters consider the Top Two Primary to be a very important issue on next year's ballot, outpacing marijuana legalization at 38%, a Constitutional Convention at 35%, and public funding for statewide elections at 32%.  The Top Two narrowly trailed gay marriage (51%) and finished third to lowering the legislative requirement to pass a budget (54%). As the 2010 elections fast approach, expect the Top Two Primary to play a pivotal role in the political polls.

Also, the Top Two Open Primary is receiving considerable attention in several media outlets.  Thomas Elias wrote a strong endorsement in the San Jose Mercury News, while Steven Greenhut and Richard Winger wrote potent rebuttals in the OC Register and San Francisco Bay Guardian, respectively.

In defense of the ballot initiative, Elias offered the following points:

1.  More moderate centrists will be elected

2.  Good public policy will trump partisan ideology

3.  It will give a voice to millions of voters

4.  It will serve as the first step toward a better, faster, and surer government, even more so than a Constitutional Convention

5.  If party ideologues despise the measure, then it must contain some merit

6.  Candidates would have to court voters across the political spectrum

7.  With California crippled by paralytic dysfunction, voters should consider the initiative a top priority

In opposition to the ballot initiative, Greenhut and Winger offered the following points:

1.  Initiative supporters seek candidates who think as they do

2.  Moderates have not solved California's problems

3.  It would not address the state's core fiscal issues

4.  It would eliminate third parties from the general election

5.  Incumbents, as in Louisiana and Washington, would retain a high re-election rate

6.  It would eliminate write-ins

7.  It would hamper debate and reduce voter choice

As next year's elections draw near, independent-minded voters are encouraged to carefully study both perspectives and draw their own conclusions.  California is in desperate need of authentic, political and fiscal reform, and independents will play a crucial role in reshaping the golden state as the fastest growing segment of the electorate.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Debate heats up over Top Two Primary

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us