Skip to content

Cost of Campaigning: $5.8 Billion Better Spent

Cost of Campaigning: $5.8 Billion Better Spent
Published:

The Cost of Campaigning, as reported by the Center for Responsive Politics

Cost of Campaigning

In an attempt to earn the highest office of the United States of America, both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama have set records in spending, with the cost of campaigning skyrocketing daily.

As the presidential candidates talk about solutions, there is a void in policy making, replaced instead by campaign rhetoric, and above all, campaign fundraising. Projected by the Center for Responsive Politics, fundraising and campaign costs for the 2012 presidential race will top $2.5 billion.

That's just the presidential race. Total, the Presidential and Congressional races, political party costs, and outside money will total a whopping $5.8 billion. CNBC did the math, and the projected cost of campaigning for Barack Obama and Mitt Romney equals a combined $26.86 every second this election cycle -- that's more than three times the federal minimum wage per hour, current set at $7.25.

In a time of economic recovery, the excessive waste associated with these costs is troubling. Putting these numbers into perspective, MDG Advertising has created an interactive infographic that begs that question: How else could that money have been spent?

"The Dollars and Senselessness of Political Campaigning outlines the ways in which campaign cash could have been spent if resources were funneled towards one of six categories: small business, education, family living, health, housing, or fun. Lastly, their interactive infographic gives users the opportunity to decide where the 5.8 billion election dollars would be better spent.

Small Business

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

Education

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

Family Living

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

Health

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

And while the candidates debate about "Obamacare,"

With the money spent arguing over "Obamacare," the presidential candidates could have already covered:

Individuals

61,052,631 people paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 2014

17,846,153 people paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 20158,345,323 people paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 2016

Families

20,350,877 families paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 2014

5,948,717 families paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 20152,781,774 families paying the minimum Obamacare tax in 2016

Housing

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

Fun

The $5.8 billion could have been spent on:

Find more facts and decide how would you spend the $5.8 billion used to fund the 2012 Election at MDG Advertising and follow them on Twitter:

The Dollars and Senselessness of Political Campaigning [Interactive Infographic]

Interactive Infographic by MDG Advertising

Jane Susskind

Jane Susskind is a Judicial Law Clerk at Nevada Supreme Court.

IVN is rated Center by AllSides and High Credibility by MBFC — follow our independent journalism in your feed.

Add IVN on Google

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.