Skip to content
Subscribe

Climate change proponents battered by inaccurate scientific claims

Published:

In my opinion, climate change is happening. However, the recent spate of well-documented reports of evasions, stonewalling, and sloppy research about global warming has certainly damaged credibility. What was supposed to be impartial science has been shown on at least three occasions to be anything but that.  But, maybe the important thing about renewable energy and cleantech isn’t so much whether climate change is happening, but how it can help us as a country. More on that after these reports of climate change scientists being, ahem, less than objective.

IPCC head was told of false Himalayan glacier melting claim before Copenhagen summit. He said nothing, even though he knew that several glaciologists had refuted the claim.  The University of East Anglia broke the law by deliberately refusing to make climate data available to climate skeptics. Their mail servers were also hacked, with embarrassing revelations to them.  U.N.'s global warming findings on the Brazilian rainforest are not accurate. Their prediction that 40% of the rainforest was endangered by climate change was based on a number given by an independent author, who was discussing the effects of harmful logging, not climate change.

How did this get so politicized? The two opposing sides launch salvos at each other, trying to destroy the other’s credibility. Thus, little gets accomplished.  Sounds like our Congress. Doesn’t it?

Other countries don’t have this problem. They agree to disagree, and work together to create energy. China, Japan, Europe, and the UK are way ahead of the US in implementing renewable energy.  Clean Edge visited China four year ago, and had this to say:

I was struck by the nation's lack of animosity, if you will, among energy sources. Coal or gas advocates there didn't     pooh-pooh wind and solar as intermittent, not scalable, or not ready for prime time. The Chinese mantra was (and is): it's all energy, and we need lots more of it – bring it on.

Spain gets 14% of their power from wind. Germany made a major and successful push to get solar installed on residential buildings. The UK is planning massive offshore wind and wave power projects. France gets most their power from nuclear. They just don’t seem to squabble as much about climate change and renewable energy as we do.

Rather than telling people that renewable energy must happen or else we’re all doomed by climate change, a more sensible approach is to present it as a way to generate power here in the US without importing oil and gas. If you tell a Texas rancher he must change his ways because global warming is coming, he might call you a greenie crackpot. But if you tell him a wind farm wants to install turbines on his land and pay him royalties or that he can turn agricultural waste into biofuel he can use or sell, then he will probably listen.

The extreme politicization of the climate change debate here in the US mirrors our politics at large. This simply isn’t an issue elsewhere.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Climate change proponents battered by inaccurate scientific claims

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us