Skip to content
Subscribe

California's budget fiasco

Published:

California budget negotiations have an eternal air of unreality about them. Negotiators make lofty assumptions about income and revenue, only to be proven wrong later. Complicated proposals requiring the approval of eternally squabbling factions are floated as though they have a fine chance of being passed. Democrats resist spending cuts, while Republicans insist taxes must never be raised. Both sides accuse the other of villainous maneuvers, of moving money around from entity to entity in a mad pretense that somehow constitutes balancing a budget. Yet they both do it.

All of this is done in slow motion and with apparent unconcern, as if to say that California is so filled with wonderfulness that such problems will no doubt just magically be solved because of the inherent specialness of the state. Or so it seems. There is no sense of urgency, no thought given to the obvious. The financial clock continues to tick. California becomes more insolvent each day. Yet, a budget agreement is now months late with no solution in sight.

Gov. Brown's ambitious plan to ask voters to approve an extension of temporary taxes will clearly not be happening. Thus, the usual mix of ideology and special interests from all sides ensured that voters will not have a chance to express their will about taxes, public pension reform, or a spending cap. Goodness no, we can't have that. Assorted special interests might be negatively affected. And that would just be so wrong. Instead, Sacramento continues to sleep walk. They've been doing it for years.

Did you know that Utah diagnosed and reformed its public pension plan last year? That's right, its legislature realized its current public pension system was in deep trouble and that the state could become liable for huge amounts of money that it could not afford. So they went from a defined benefits plan to defined contributions in 2010. No muss, no fuss, they just went ahead and did it in one year.

Meanwhile, California has been squabbling about its increasingly insolvent public pension system for years, with no coherent plans floated, much less instituted. Sure, public unions have far more power in California than in Utah. But our legislature in Sacramento has been gridlocked on budget matters for years. Gov. Gray Davis went down in flames over the budget, recalled by Schwarzenegger who tried valiantly and failed to fix the budget. Now Gov. Brown, just a few months after his election, is similarly stymied. The Sacramento swamp claims another one. No one here gets out alive.

Gov. Brown is now reduced to theatrics like cutting back on state travel that is not mission critical and trying to persuade the DMV to wait on sending out vehicle renewal registrations for July in hopes they can prolong an existing rate hike. But such measures are Band-Aids on a major wound as the deficit is at least $15 billion, and growing. Brown also, with more word games, wants to extend the current base sales tax of 7.25% rather than let it drop back to 6.25%, and to do the same with a retroactive 2009 and 2010 income tax surcharge. All of this is being done under pretense, by saying this is the allowing of extensions rather than being called tax increases.

Sadly, no one in Sacramento seems to speak clearly and truthfully, and to state the obvious - which is that California is in deep and worsening financial trouble and that tough solutions are needed now.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California's budget fiasco

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us