Skip to content
Subscribe

California: the zombie state

Published:

It certainly seems that way sometimes, doesn't it? The California legislature shambles around, bumping into things, with no apparent sense of direction. Issues that managed to get resolved quickly in other states (like Utah revising their public pension plans in one year flat) take ponderously interminable amounts of time for California to even start pondering them.

This certainly seems zombie-like to me, and also to economist William Watkins of California Lutheran University.  He says California is in serious danger of falling behind, both nationally and in global commerce. High taxes, overgrown thickets of regulations, a decaying infrastructure, and substandard education are among the problems creating a permanent underclass and an environment seriously unattractive to massive investments. If a company is thinking of spending $200 million to build a new assembly plant, do you think their first choice will be a state with an unbalanced budget and abysmal credit rating?  I'm guessing not.

But California shambles on. Surf's up, the sun is out, and the Promised Land seem to be the implicit belief. Therefore, these current troubles must just be little speed bumps before the economy comes roaring back again and Cali regains its former glory. Well, maybe not. Some think California could be in for a decade or two more of economic stagnation. This would mean that the current severe budget cuts will look minor in comparison to the governmental downsizing that will follow, and California would become another Michigan. Michigan? Say it ain't so!

Where will the recovery and growth come from? I don't see any economic engine that will power a recovery except maybe cleantech. But cleantech can't possibly carry the whole state.

Maddeningly there's no sense of urgency about solving these problems, especially not at the state level. The shambling of the zombies continues. The Supreme Court recently ruled that California must release tens of thousands of inmates because of chronic and unconstitutional overcrowding. California has known since a court decision in 1996 that a ruling like this could happen. Instead of being proactive and fixing the overcrowding, it - you guessed it - shambled around for 15 years instead. Even more disconcertingly, Gov. Brown seems positively cheery about the ruling because it gives him an excuse to transfer the inmates to counties and let them deal with it. The counties of course are utterly unprepared to handle a huge influx of new inmates.

This kind of short-sighted approach, where problems are ignored until they fester, then kicked someplace else for someone else to deal with, is a primary reason why California is becoming zombie-like.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California: the zombie state

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us