Skip to content
Subscribe

California School Funding Plans Retain Strong Public Support

Published:

The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) released its May survey that gauges public opinion on state government affairs. From a California school funding aspect, Governor Brown's revised budget proposals are receiving strong support. However, the California Business Roundtable (CBRT) poll says it is not as high as PPIC suggests.

Brown's $1 billion push for Common Core standards implementation was unexpected, but 73 percent of adults and 83 percent of public school parents agree with the governor. About $170 will be spent per student to get them more acquainted with the new curriculum.

The following is the wording of the question and the results by demographic:

“As part of his revised budget plan, Governor Brown proposes providing K–12 schools with $1 billion in one-time revenues to fund teacher training, textbooks, and computers to support the implementation of the 'Common Core State Standards,' a new set of English and math standards that the state will roll out in 2014. Do you favor or oppose this proposal?” Credit: Public Policy Institute of California
California School Funding Plans Retain Strong Public Support 1

When asked about the new local control funding formula, 77 percent of all adults and 83 percent of students' parents showed favored plans. This is a fairly large increase from already strong support. In the PPIC's April survey, support was at 71 percent and 72 percent, respectively.

Here is the question and results:

“In his revised budget plan, Governor Brown proposes giving each K–12 public school district more funding than they received in 2011–12 and providing additional funding to school districts that have more English language learners and lower-income students. Do you favor or oppose this proposal?” Credit: Public Policy Institute of California
California School Funding Plans Retain Strong Public Support 2

It seems like Brown hit a home run with K-12 education advocates and parents with his funding proposals. The California Business Roundtable shows that support for the new funding formula is at 54.5 percent.

Albeit, the question presented was worded much differently, most likely impacting the disparity in results between the PPIC and CBRT:

"Generally speaking, do you support or oppose the governor’s proposed plan to allocate additional money to school districts with higher populations of high-needs students?" Credit: California Business Roundtable, Pepperdine University
California School Funding Plans Retain Strong Public Support 3

Results from both organizations are well beyond each others' margin of error (PPIC, +/- 3.8 percent, CBRT, +/- 3.5 percent). Fox & Hounds discussed the disparity between the two polls and highlighted the gap in respondents belief of a budget surplus or revenue.

Jeff Harrelson of M4 Strategies, the conductors of the CBRT poll, was quoted on Fox & Hounds regarding the differing results:

"Voters aren’t real engaged right now with the political process.  We just came off of a hard fought presidential campaign and a number of contentious ballot initiatives, so state budgets aren’t the first thing on voters’ minds."

In both polls, Brown's education funding proposals remain well-received by Californians. However, he will have to work with the Senate closely in the coming weeks. The Senate is proposing an alternative funding formula, but it does not stray far away from Brown's concepts.

The California Constitution requires the state government to pass a budget by June 15. The state has a long history of missing budget deadlines, but this process should be smoother than the past with a Democratic majority despite disagreements between party members.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California School Funding Plans Retain Strong Public Support

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us