Skip to content
Subscribe

California Could See Over $1.4 Billion Revenue Spike From Tax Cannabis Act

Published:

California's very own State Board of Equalization reports in its legislative bill analysis that revenues from a bill similar to the Tax Cannabis Act would equal roughly $1.4 billion.

With California's budget in crisis mode, the Tax Cannabis Act could be a welcome boon with schools, families, and communities reeling from cuts that hardly dent the colossal budget gap.

Over at FireDogLake, Jon Walker has a long list of things California could afford with all that extra revenue. The list includes among other things, hiring 23,000 teachers, police, or firefighters; providing health insurance to one million children; or providing maximum unemployment benefits for a full year to 59,000 Californians.

While I hate to rain on the spending parade, California could also just pay off some of its massive debt, and use the added revenue as a way out of a crisis- a cushion to help ease the transition to a more responsible fiscal policy. The Tax Cannabis Act could be California's ticket out of a vicious cycle of debt-funded spending.

With Californians evenly split on the issue of cannabis legalization, this figure could be welcome news for the tax cannabis movement, especially considering the typical trend of California ballot propositions to lose momentum and support over time. The State Board of Equalization's report that California has $1.4 billion to gain, could be enough to tip the scales of public opinion in favor legalizing and taxing cannabis this November.

It's also worth mentioning that the state will see a financial boost that goes above and beyond the possible $1.4 billion in tax revenues from the legal sale of marijuana. The new jobs and economic growth of an entire industry will increase the broader tax base, and thereby boost revenues.

Dollars that presently make their way back to Mexico will end up staying (and being spent in) California, boosting sales for (and tax revenues from) other non-cannabis-related businesses in California, growing the tax base even more, while providing relief to businesses struggling in an economic downturn.

Then there are the state's expense accounts to consider. The untold millions of dollars California spends on police activity, drug interdiction, litigation, and incarceration would be spared from the budget, netting the state even more financial benefits if the Tax Cannabis Act is passed in November.

While moral, safety, and health issues hang in the balance, with $1.4 billion or more to gain, the tax cannabis movement just might have made California an offer that is too good to refuse.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California Could See Over $1.4 Billion Revenue Spike From Tax Cannabis Act

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us