Skip to content
Subscribe

California climate change bill meets stiff opposition from taxpayer group

Published:

Answer quickly:  what does climate change have to do with Prop 13?  Apparently, more than we thought, because the Howard Jarvis Taxpayer Association (HJTA) has joined leagues with Texas-based Valero Energy Corporation to fight California AB32, one of the principle legislative tools for the state to address global warming and air cleanliness.

There’s no question that the Jarvis group, which spends most of its time defending the impact of the 30 year old proposition that was initiated by its late namesake, brings a lot of value to the coalition – it’s from California, as opposed to its partner, which is from the most pollution-laden state in the nation (remember – that used to be us).

One of the key provisions of AB-32 is the 2020 target for renewable energy sources supplied to the statewide power grid.  That number has grown from 20 percent to 33 percent under a recent gubernatorial mandate, and the result has been a boon to the renewable power industries such as solar and wind.

In recent days, California’s aggressive support of renewable resources has brought jobs to Sacramento, as Roseville’s Solar Power Inc. announced that it would transition in-source manufacturing of its solar photo-voltaic panels from China to California.   Tangentially, another important solar project was scheduled to be announced in nearby Sparks, NV next week, supported by NV Energy's SolarGenerations program that encourages the integration of renewable resources into the state’s overall power equation.

Solar Power Inc.’s decision to move its manufacturing from China to the U.S. resurrects the Sacramento region’s solar opportunities, which were dashed some months ago when the now-defunct OptiSolar’s 1,000-person plant site was scrapped because of the economic downturn.

So, why does a growing solar industry threaten the tax-cutting advocates who are part of the HJTA?  Perhaps they object to governmental subsidies of these nascent “green” industries.  But, we subsidized telegraphy, telephony, and agriculture with considerable success.  We even subsidize Valero and its companion corporations in the fossil fuel industry.  And we subsidize every homeowner in California through Howard Jarvis’ original idea to cut property taxes, and through federal and state tax breaks on mortgage interest.

Therefore, HJTA's opposition to green subsidies would appear to be internally inconsistent.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California climate change bill meets stiff opposition from taxpayer group

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us