Skip to content
Subscribe

California budget negotiations approaching train wreck proportions again

Published:

The Kabuki Theater that is the California budget crisis continues. Republicans ask for the moon, then perhaps unknowingly use a classic Saul Alinsky tactic, while Gov. Brown freezes state hiring except for his staff and whomever else he might want to exempt.

On Feb. 15, California Republican legislators demanded Gov. Brown enact his $12 billion in proposed budget cuts before they vote on whether to approve his special election on the budget and taxes scheduled for June 7. Brown needs at least a few Republican votes for the special election to pass (assuming all Democrats vote yes.) Part of what Republicans want includes public pension reductions. The effective deadline for this to happen would be March 7, as the state needs three months to prepare for the election. But it's simply not possible for the governor to implement sweeping public pension reform in a couple of weeks. Plus, even if he could, it's a certainty that CalPERS and public unions would sue to block it, tying it up in court for years.  The Republicans also want a permanent cap on spending, less regulations, tax reform, and liberals to be banished to the netherworld forever. (No, wait, that last one can't be right…)

Clearly, these demands are either a Republican ploy to block the special election from happening or ask for the moon then presumably settle for less.

Last Thursday, Republicans upped the ante saying they won't vote to put taxes on the ballot even if Brown does magically slash pension benefits and impose a spending cap.  Republican Sen. Bob Dutton of Rancho Cucamonga said, "They [Democrats] really don't need us to govern at all. They just need us if they want to raise taxes." The senator may not be aware of this, but this is a classic organizing technique described by Saul Alinksy as "Eyes, Ears, and Nose."

Eyes:"If you have a vast organization, parade it before the enemy, openly show your power."

Ears:"If your organization is small, do what Gideon did: conceal the members in the dark but raise a clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more that it does."

Nose: "If your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place."

And that's just what the Republicans are doing, stinking up the place. It's generally an effective tactic too.

Meanwhile, Gov. Brown instituted a hiring freeze for state employees. However, he exempts top-level appointments for his administration as well as agencies performing "core functions." He says this will save $363 million a year. However, the state payroll will be $15 billion this year, so that's a 2.4% cut which isn't a whole lot more than a rounding error. Given that "core functions" remain tantalizingly undefined, we can certainly expect a multitude of state agencies to claim they do indeed qualify, which should lead to some exciting and savage infighting indeed.

Republicans denounced the non-partisan Legislative Analyst's Office report on how to solve the budget crisis without new taxes as essentially being scare tactics from Democrats to force the budget special election. So, as you can see, the two parties remain far apart. Both sides engage in Kabuki, with often insincere efforts primarily meant for show, fifteen second sound bites, and a rallying cry for their base.

Folks, I spend a good amount of time out of California. When I mention California's budget problems to people in other states, a not uncommon reaction is that they roll their eyes, giggle, and say something like, "Well, California really is the poster child for incompetence, isn't it?"  The Golden State has become a laughingstock. It doesn't have to be this way. But if the state as whole doesn't change, and fast, then events will force that change.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California budget negotiations approaching train wreck proportions again

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us