Skip to content
Subscribe

California budget impasse continues

Published:

"Well now it's just gotten silly" - John Cleese, in Monty Python

What can you say to Gov. Schwarzenegger's  latest  ploy to balance the budget except that he now has indeed, just gotten silly. Our supposedly fiscally conservative governor wants to borrow $2 billion from CalPERS, the giant state public pension fund, to help balance the still-to-pass California budget for 2010-2011. There's just so much wrong with this bizarre idea that it's difficult to know where to start.

First, and foremost, the state will pay CalPERS $3.6 billion this year to cover their immense funding shortfall.  Then the governor wants to borrow back $2 billion of that money? This is nonsensical. Since CalPERS can legally force the state to cover its deficits, could it just come back and ask for the $2 billion again? Maybe this is a ploy by Schwarzenegger to simply not fund CalPERS fully. It certainly seems to be a desperation move ((especially considering that he also just ordered a delay in payments of $2.9 billion a month to school districts and counties so the state can pay debt and pensions.)

Second, the money would be an advance against future savings paid back over at least 20 years, assuming Schwarzenegger gets to pole axe pensions for new hires back to the 1990 level, saving the state many billions.  Even if he can force that, I'm unclear on the funding for the loan payback.  Specifically, where would the money come from?

Third, if California is ever to recover financially, it simply has to stop borrowing against the future to cover a deficit now. This is both fiscally irresponsible and deeply cynical. It just kicks the problem down the road a few years while politicians pretend to have fixed it now.

Meanwhile, Sacramento Democrats are stonewalling too. Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg pledges no deep cuts in education or welfare-to-work programs. These would be funded by higher taxes, but he promises individual citizen's taxes won't go up, something the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office disputes.

Republicans say that education funding is at the same level as last year. Democrats say $3 billion more is needed, in part because deferred costs finally had to be paid off. This is a clear example of why trying to push financial problems out a few years always comes back to bite, usually at inopportune times too, and when the state is even further financially weakened.

Some college students aren't able to plan their year or even know if they can go to college, because of the budget gridlock. Their Cal Grant money is frozen. State workers hardly know from one week to the next whether there will be further furloughs, if they will get a check or an IOU, or even have a job.  Gee, I bet morale is just great in many state agencies now. But the problems of state workers or college students appear inconsequential to politicians of both parties in Sacramento. Republicans scream "No new taxes." Democrats yell "No budget cuts."

There have been no substantive budget negotiations in weeks, even though the state constitution mandates the budget be passed by June 15. Really, what we have is a bunch of overgrown infants in expensive suits banging their rattles on the high chair until they get their way. But this is no way to run a government.

California is becoming a laughingstock, the national poster child for legislative incompetence, as the budget crisis continues.  The longer they wait, the worse things get for the state too.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California budget impasse continues

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us