Skip to content
Subscribe

California budget assumes a sustained recovery even as economy slows

Published:

The recently passed California budget assumed $4 billion in increased revenues. Without that additional income, the budget will not be balanced. Draconian cuts will then ensue, and will hit education hard.

The estimates in revenue increases were apparently due to the expectation that high income individuals, especially in tech, will be making substantially more, and thus paying more in taxes. While there has been a burst of IPOs in Silicon Valley recently, which has created instant mega-millionaires, it's difficult to see how this could lead to sustained and reliable income for the state.

Early last Friday morning, financial sites and blogs were buzzing about how the jobs report was surely going to exceed expectations, and that this would be proof that recovery was at hand. But instead, the jobs report was beyond dismal. Only 18,000 net jobs were created in June, far less than the 150,000 that analysts were expecting.  Spring was expected to be just a temporary slump, with numbers rebounding in the summer. Instead, the opposite happened. The numbers got worse.

The unemployment rate in California in May was 11.7% vs. 9.1% for the U.S.. Marin County has the lowest unemployment, at 7.4%, while Imperial County has a Depression-level rate of 27.2%. California is also tied with Georgia for having the worst teen jobless rate, a whopping 34.6%.

So, where's the recovery that will boost state revenues? Surely it will have to come from more than a few techie geeks who just became multi-millionaires and are probably working 80 hour weeks and thus have no time to spend their money anyway. A real recovery has to include everyone. That means those jobless teenagers too, the ones who can only hope for employment asking "Do you want fries with that?"

Cleantech and renewable energy are also seen as possible job growth machines. But in reality, while these technologies may be promising, the number of jobs created by them even in the best of circumstances is nowhere near what is needed.

California legislators are known for making rosy estimates of future revenue in order to pass a budget only to have the reality be somewhat less than that. But there is no fat left to cut in the budget. If all or some of that $4 billion doesn't materialize, then California education could suffer another $2.5 billion in cuts on top of what has already been cut.

Last week's horrific jobs report makes this all the more probable. Yet, by slashing education, California makes it increasingly difficult for its teenagers to be sufficiently educated to truly compete in our global economy.  Somehow, this downward spiral needs to be reversed.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California budget assumes a sustained recovery even as economy slows

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us