Skip to content
Subscribe

'Bipartisan Path Forward' Proposes $2.5 Trillion in Savings

Published:

Erskine Bowles (left) and Alan Simpson (right) // credit. momentoftruthproject.org

Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson // credit. momentoftruthproject.org

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), a nonprofit organization focused on fiscal policy, completed its analysis of the "Bipartisan Path Forward to Securing America’s Future."

As the latest policy development from the bipartisan National Committee on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (NCFRR), the proposal touches nearly every sector of government spending from education to tax reform to health care. It advertises nearly $2.5 trillion in savings over 10 years.

The authors of the new proposal include Alan Simpson, formerly a Republican senator from Wyoming, and Erskine Bowles, former chief of staff under Bill Clinton. The two were appointed co-chairs of the NCFRR by President Obama in 2010, tasked with finding a balanced solution to the nation's growing debt crisis.

The first budget recommendation from the bipartisan team -- what was known simply as 'Simpson-Bowles' was shot down in Congress last year. Consequently, the new 'Simpson-Bowles' plan hopes to find an acceptable middle ground, eschewing austerity while reducing the deficit.

Providing for multiple spending scenarios, the authors contend that the proposed package would reduce the debt in various ways while protecting economic growth. From the analysis:

"Under the proposal, debt would fall from 76.4 percent of GDP in 2013 to 69.3 percent of GDP in 2023, compared to 79.0 percent of GDP under our CRFB realistic baseline. Revenues would be 19.7 percent of GDP in 2023 compared to 19.1 percent under the CRFB realistic baseline... It's very encouraging to see a bipartisan approach that exceeds CRFB's recommendation for $2.4 trillion in additional deficit reduction. Along with the already released budget proposals, lawmakers could use the "Bipartisan Path Forward" as a guide for replacing sequestration with smart deficit reduction."

The key revisions in the latest Simpson-Bowles plan include:

  • Chained CPI
  • Strengthening the Pell Grant program
  • Many low-income programs are untouched
  • Structural reforms to Medicaid
  • A Medicare buy-in
  • Increasing the retirement age
  • Repealing sequestration
  • And indexing the debt ceiling to GDP

It remains to be seen if the new bipartisan effort will pick up any steam when put before Congress in the coming weeks.

Despite last year's momentum going into budget talks, lawmakers were unable to agree to the major budget provisions put forward in the original Simpson-Bowles plan. Similar difficulties await the new proposal this year, yet both Simpson and Bowles remain confident that a compromise is within reach.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

'Bipartisan Path Forward' Proposes $2.5 Trillion in Savings

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us