Skip to content
Subscribe

Is the Alternative Minimum Tax Affecting the Middle Class?

Published:

IRS Building in Washington DC // Credit: Wikimedia Commons

As lawmakers broil and simmer over budget reform, many Americans are primarily concerned as to whether or not their tax obligations will go up in 2013. One possible contributor to higher taxes for middle class Americans is the alternative minimum income tax, or AMT.

The alternative minimum tax, introduced in 1969 and modernized in 1982, was intended to ensure that the wealthy, who had been abusing tax loopholes and deductions for decades prior, would be required to pay at least some federal taxes on their incomes. All current taxpayers, however, are required to calculate their taxes under both the normal tax system and the AMT, and then pay the higher total. Under the AMT, deductions and tax exemptions that are normally allowed are either nonexistent or far less generous.

The primary culprit for the AMT's new-found regressive quality is inflation. The average rate of inflation since 1970 has been about 4 percent, but the AMT has failed to catch up. In 2007, the Brookings Institute found:

"The AMT is not adjusted for inflation whereas the regular income tax is. This means that if an individual’s income just keeps pace with inflation each year, his or her regular income tax would remain constant (in real terms) while AMT liability would rise."

Although Congress has raised the obligation thresholds for the AMT numerous times in the last couple of years, families making under $100,000 a year are still vulnerable to the alternative tax system, particularly ones with numerous children. If Congress fails to patch the AMT again for 2013, millions of new taxpayers will be subject to the AMT in their next filing.

A myriad of bills have been introduced to raise this exemption for 2013 but have been held up in the House of Representatives, like H.R.8 (Job Protection and Recession Prevention Act of 2012) sponsored by Dave Camp (R-Michigan) and H.R.15 (Middle Class Tax Cut Act) sponsored by Sander Levin (D-Michigan). On Tuesday, a motion to discharge H.R. 15 out of the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on the Budget will allow the bill to be voted on provided it reaches the necessary 218 signatures. The petition currently holds 178.

The AMT still remains the best way to ensure that the extremely wealthy pay some form of federal income tax. However, barring a complete tax overhaul, many middle class Americans will remain subject to the alternative tax structure.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Is the Alternative Minimum Tax Affecting the Middle Class?

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us