Skip to content
Subscribe

ACLU Says N.C. Law Puts Your Freedom to Marry in Jeopardy

Published:

A new North Carolina law aiming to protect court officials' religious freedoms may create a stumbling block for not only same-sex couples wanting to marry, but all couples who want to get hitched.

Senate Bill 2 became law earlier this month, allowing magistrates to recuse themselves from performing marriages, and assistant and deputy registers of deeds to choose not to issue marriage licenses. Though the law does not specifically reference same-sex marriage, LGBT advocates say the move clearly targets gay couples.

"The timing of SB2's introduction, on the first day our legislature introduced bills after court rulings invalidating our state ban on the freedom to marry -- as well as comments from its legislative supporters -- make plain the measure was motivated by marriage equality coming to North Carolina," said Chris Brook, legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina.Officials who take advantage of the law are

required to abstain from performing all marriage-related duties for six months. Only time will tell whether or not this will cause problems for those seeking to marry.

"We will know in the coming weeks how serious a hurdle SB2 represents to the freedom to marry in North Carolina," Brook said. "SB2 states that a minimum of 10 hours must be provided for couples, be they opposite or same-sex, to access civil marriage services in each county. However, some smaller counties in our state have as few as three magistrates (the judicial officials responsible for conducting civil marriages) for the entire county. If any magistrate recuses himself or herself in these smaller counties, then it could stretch limited resources to the breaking point."

Even if the law doesn't create a practical hurdle, some advocates say the symbolism behind it is a problem.

"We have not seen a shutdown a la what happened in Alabama awhile back," said Brian Goldsmith, a board member of Catawba Valley Pride. "While this is not a major road block, discrimination is unacceptable."

As well as being problematic from a legal standpoint, it's out of step with state residents, Brook said.

"The legislature is out of step with North Carolinians in its efforts to stigmatize our gay and lesbian family, friends, and neighbors," he said. "Poll after poll indicates record-high support for LGBT equality -- including the freedom to marry -- in North Carolina, flying in the face of the legislature's repeated efforts to enshrine discrimination into law."

If legislators don't recognize that sooner rather than later, it could be to their detriment, Goldsmith said.

"I think that the world is changing faster than the backers of this bill realize, and some of them might pay with their jobs come next election," he said.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

ACLU Says N.C. Law Puts Your Freedom to Marry in Jeopardy

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us