Skip to content
Subscribe

Looking to 2020: A Battle Plan for Independents and Reformers

Published:

The majority of voters are clearly fed up with politics as usual in Washington. Tens of millions feel disenfranchised, they believe elections are either broken or rigged, and most do not feel represented by the Republican and Democratic Parties.

The broad frustration, discontent, and outrage over the current state of American politics leave the independent and reform movements with both opportunities and challenges in future elections.

"The behemoth battles in Washington, and the media circus surrounding them, serve to mask the gulf that continues to widen between the government and the people," says Jacqueline Salit, president of Independent Voting.

She recently penned a paper titled, "Finding Otherness: A Blueprint for An Independent Conversation About 2020." It lays out some of the opportunities for political reformers to fix elections and even unify ahead of 2020.

The blueprint addresses two questions in particular:

1) "How should reformers be working to fix the system, revitalize American democracy, and give greater power to the American people?"

2) What strategy, if any, should independents and reformers be considering for the 2020 presidential election?

Salit notes that there are already several organizations working on the first question, including the Independent Voter Project (a co-publisher of IVN), Independent Voting, Open Primaries, Level the Playing Field, Represent.us, The Centrist Project, FairVote, Bridge Alliance, and more.

She adds that there are "substantive and tactical differences" between these organizations, including their stated missions for reform, their roots, and how they operate. Yet all of these organizations agree that "systemic reform is urgent."

The second question, Salit admits, is a bit tricker. She believes it is possible for the independent/reform movements to unite. She believes it all comes down to the will to make it happen

"The period between now and 2020 offers a heightened opportunity to challenge the corruption of the 'partisan/special interest complex' and the reinforced hegemony of the major parties," she explains.

Salit expounds on the current opportunities and challenges in this area, including the strengths and pitfalls of the "third party route," the specific barriers presidential primaries put up in several states, what we can learn from the "Sanders Factor," the "Trump Factor," as well as the strategy for unification and finding "otherness" in 2020.

RELATED ARTICLE: 5 Reasons Why We Must Put an End to Closed Primaries

"Independents are in a position to take advantage, not just of the disaffection with both parties and with the President, but of the new recognition of the systemic and cultural barriers to moving beyond them," writes Salit.

Salit concludes that it must begin with a conversation. We must engage with each other on these topics, including offering remarks, critiques, and alternative paths and tactics for change.

Salit hopes her blueprint is the beginning of this broader, more far-reaching conversation.

"Ms. Salit’s blueprint is comprehensive and well-informed. A must read for anyone challenging the entrenched system," said Chad Peace, attorney for the Independent Voter Project."Salit understands in her bones the need to break up the two-party duopoly to allow an independent candidate for president to emerge," said Cara McCormick, executive director of Level the Playing Field."In 2016, the parties produced a choice between the two most disliked presidential candidates in history. Salit acknowledges that working to open up the general election presidential debates to more than just two candidates is key to giving the American people what they want: a more open and competitive system that produces candidates with better ideas and broader appeal." - Cara McCormick

Read Jacqueline Salit's "Finding Otherness: A Blueprint for an Independent Conversation about 2020" below:

Photo Credit: Scott Cornell / shutterstock.com

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Looking to 2020: A Battle Plan for Independents and Reformers

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us