Millions of Voters Had One Goal in 2018: Unrig the Two-Party System

Millions of Voters Had One Goal in 2018: Unrig the Two-Party System
Published: 26 Nov, 2018
2 min read

Our country stands divided, now more than ever.

But whether red or blue, young or old, rural or urban, voters share a common interest in expanding their choices at the ballot box while protecting majority outcomes.

These ideals fueled the flames for a ranked choice voting revolution (RCV) in Maine, which just made history by becoming the first state to elect a U.S. Senator and two House members using RCV. Maine now joins the ranks of a dozen other cities that turned to ranked choice voting to solve their electoral woes.

The 2018 elections saw three different voting methods proposed through local ballot measures: voters in Memphis voted to rescue RCV from a council-led repeal, while Fargo, North Dakota and Lane County, Oregon explored newer alternatives with mixed results.

Voters in Fargo overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure to switch to approval voting for their city elections, while the Lane County ballot question that sought to replace the two-election runoff system with STAR voting narrowly lost.

Like ranked choice voting, approval and STAR (which stands for Score then Automatic Runoff)  methods let voters choose multiple candidates: all weighted equally under approval voting, or scored on a 1-5 scale under STAR.

Just as in Maine, it was the pattern of disturbingly low plurality wins in Fargo’s nonpartisan elections - including one commissioner elected with 21.8 percent of the vote in a six-way race in 2015 - that led to Reform Fargo’s ballot initiative for approval voting. Those leading the charge for STAR voting in Lane County cited a similar rationale, as well as the benefits of eliminating the “bother and cost” of the existing, two-round runoff system.

While there are key distinctions separating STAR and approval voting systems from ranked choice voting, they all demonstrate voters’ hunger for elections in which all voices and viewpoints matter and outcomes that protect majority rule.

And that’s a goal we can all get behind.

IVP Donate

Editor’s Note: This article, written by Nancy Lavin, originally published on FairVote’s website, and has been republished in its entirety.

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read