Campaigns Find New Talking Point Against Obamacare after Shaky Open Payments Launch

Created: 06 October, 2014
Updated: 15 October, 2022
2 min read

With the 2014 midterm elections less than a month away, Republican candidates around the country are continuing to use repealing Obamacare as a major reason why voters should support them and why the GOP needs to take full control over the Legislative Branch once again. From Georgia to Montana, opposition to the troubled health care law has been a core piece in many campaign platforms.

The troubles surrounding Heathcare.gov earlier this year only bolstered their claims. These campaign talking points, however, were weakened by high enrollment numbers, diminishing their impact on the election.

Now, a new report by ProPublica and the New York Times criticizing the government’s new Open Payments website has re-energized the narrative that the federal government has completely bungled its handling of Obamacare.

The purpose of Open Payments is to share the financial relationship between doctors, hospitals, and health care manufacturing companies including pharmaceutical companies. As a part of the Affordable Care Act, the goal of the online forum is to help the public better understand these relationships and how they might influence prescriptions and other medical decisions.

ProPublica, however, slams the website for “not coming anywhere near fulfilling” these objectives.

In the report by Charles Ornstein, a health care reporter, he explains that the website is incredibly confusing, noting that users found it almost impossible to search. Ornstein slams the lack of usability, including search bars being difficult to find, unfriendly data dictionary and methodology documents, and missing names because the information is incomplete.

The same contractor that created Healthcare.gov, CGI Federal, also created the Open Payments website.

On Twitter, various commentators noted how difficult the website was to use:

The dictionary to guide use of the #sunshineact open payments database is 51 pages long. Not user-friendly http://t.co/XHdkl5DgOe— Julia Belluz (@juliaoftoronto) September 30, 2014
As expected, #OpenPayments database looks pretty complex. But CMS promises "more simplified website" for consumers in “very near term" — JeffOverley (@JeffOverley) September 30, 2014
Incorrect data causes feds to temporarily shut down #OpenPayments system created by #SunshineAct http://t.co/SBwNYZpnVo— Medscape Orthopedics (@MedscapeOrtho) August 11, 2014

In addition, the Wall Street Journal has reported major errors within the system already.

IVP Existence Banner

Many doctors and medical education companies both object to part of the Open Payments system and claim that the website will breed distrust.

Less than a month before the elections, these complaints are extending beyond the medical field. With yet another government website rollout on health care bungled, the problems only serve to revive Republican objections to Obamacare.

Photo Credit: Evlakhov Valeriy / shutterstock.com

Latest articles

Trump-Biden Debate
Did the Major Party Campaigns Just End the Commission on Presidential Debates?
President Joe Biden’s campaign issued a challenge to former President Donald Trump Wednesday to two debates: One in June and one in September. The debates have to be hosted by a news outlet and will not be conducted in front of a crowd....
15 May, 2024
6 min read
Oregon Capitol Building
Only 7% of Voters Have Returned Ballots in Oregon's Closed Primaries
Imagine being part of the largest segment of the registered voting population and being denied the right to an equal vote in elections. Well, millions of voters across the US don't have to imagine this because it is a reality for them in every election cycle. ...
14 May, 2024
3 min read
Chula Vista
POLL: Nearly Two-Thirds of Chula Vista Voters Want to Change the Way They Vote
A recent poll conducted by Competitive Edge research with funding by More Choice San Diego found that 62% of voters in Chula Vista -- if given the opportunity -- would support a measure that would advance five candidates to a general election that uses ranked ballots....
13 May, 2024
2 min read