Campaigns Find New Talking Point Against Obamacare after Shaky Open Payments Launch

image
Published: 06 Oct, 2014
2 min read

With the 2014 midterm elections less than a month away, Republican candidates around the country are continuing to use repealing Obamacare as a major reason why voters should support them and why the GOP needs to take full control over the Legislative Branch once again. From Georgia to Montana, opposition to the troubled health care law has been a core piece in many campaign platforms.

The troubles surrounding Heathcare.gov earlier this year only bolstered their claims. These campaign talking points, however, were weakened by high enrollment numbers, diminishing their impact on the election.

Now, a new report by ProPublica and the New York Times criticizing the government’s new Open Payments website has re-energized the narrative that the federal government has completely bungled its handling of Obamacare.

The purpose of Open Payments is to share the financial relationship between doctors, hospitals, and health care manufacturing companies including pharmaceutical companies. As a part of the Affordable Care Act, the goal of the online forum is to help the public better understand these relationships and how they might influence prescriptions and other medical decisions.

ProPublica, however, slams the website for “not coming anywhere near fulfilling” these objectives.

In the report by Charles Ornstein, a health care reporter, he explains that the website is incredibly confusing, noting that users found it almost impossible to search. Ornstein slams the lack of usability, including search bars being difficult to find, unfriendly data dictionary and methodology documents, and missing names because the information is incomplete.

The same contractor that created Healthcare.gov, CGI Federal, also created the Open Payments website.

On Twitter, various commentators noted how difficult the website was to use:

The dictionary to guide use of the #sunshineact open payments database is 51 pages long. Not user-friendly http://t.co/XHdkl5DgOe— Julia Belluz (@juliaoftoronto) September 30, 2014
As expected, #OpenPayments database looks pretty complex. But CMS promises "more simplified website" for consumers in “very near term" — JeffOverley (@JeffOverley) September 30, 2014
Incorrect data causes feds to temporarily shut down #OpenPayments system created by #SunshineAct http://t.co/SBwNYZpnVo— Medscape Orthopedics (@MedscapeOrtho) August 11, 2014

In addition, the Wall Street Journal has reported major errors within the system already.

IVP Donate

Many doctors and medical education companies both object to part of the Open Payments system and claim that the website will breed distrust.

Less than a month before the elections, these complaints are extending beyond the medical field. With yet another government website rollout on health care bungled, the problems only serve to revive Republican objections to Obamacare.

Photo Credit: Evlakhov Valeriy / shutterstock.com

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read