Skip to content
Subscribe

Howorth, Allen Among Field of SD-26 Candidates Who Support Top-Two Primary

Published:

Going into the California primary on June 3, the race for state Senate District 26 went from one of the least competitive districts in the state to one of the most competitive thanks to the nonpartisan, top-two open primary system.

The two highest profile candidates in the race, Amy Howorth and Ben Allen, both support the nonpartisan primary system and have made the greatest efforts at reaching out to voters across party lines. Under "Top-Two" -- approved by state voters in 2010 under Proposition 14 -- all candidates appear on a single ballot, regardless of party affiliation, giving voters an equal opportunity to select the candidate they want to vote for most.

Howorth, the mayor of Manhattan Beach, has made support of open primary a cornerstone of her campaign. Allen, a school board member for Santa Monica-Malibu United School District, has received support from businessman and philanthropist Bill Bloomfield, who was one of the earliest supporters of the new primary system.

Voters in SD-26 will have 6 other candidates to choose from on election day, all of whom are also aligning themselves with the popular top-two primary -- further evidence of the popularity of the primary reform.

SD-26, which includes Beverly Hills, Redondo Beach, Santa Monica, and parts of Los Angeles, is a heavily Democratic district. Democrats in non-special general elections have a record of garnering close to 90 percent of the vote. In 2010, when there were 4 candidates on the general election ballot, the Democratic incumbent still managed to get over 81 percent of the vote.

Under the old rules, the winner of the June primary would more than likely have been unopposed in November. The single NPP candidate running wouldn't have been able to be on the primary ballot and would have needed to turn to the petition process after the primary.

With 8 candidates on the ballot, independent and Republican voters will have a dramatic impact on the results and every candidate will have to reach out to all voting blocs to make it on the general election ballot -- not just their own partisan base.

Though the general election will likely be a same-party race, there will be a greater effort on the part of the candidates in SD-26 to provide positions and viewpoints that appeal to ALL voters -- giving the electorate a senator more representative of the district's constituency.

This is why California's nonpartisan, top-two open primary is light years ahead of partisan primary systems in states like Texas in providing fair elections that give every voter the equal opportunity to vote for whomever they choose, not who the fringes of each party choose.

On Tuesday, May 27, Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst lost another runoff election against a tea party favorite, this time against state Senator Dan Patrick (R-Houston). The election wasn't even close. Patrick garnered 65 percent of the 748,448 votes cast in the race. To put that in perspective, that is nearly 100,000 less than the total population of Austin, the state's capital, or 5.50 percent of total registered voters.

Those familiar with Texas politics will argue that the lieutenant governor is more powerful than the state's governor -- in terms of political influence, this is certainly true. In Texas, the lieutenant governor rules the state Senate. He appoints all committee chairs, assigns bills to committees, and has the power to hold bills without a hearing.

It's a powerful position in the Executive Branch and it was just decided by less than 4 percent of state voters -- closer to 3.6 percent.

In a state as red as Texas, the general election for a statewide office like lieutenant governor is considered a formality more than anything. The real race is in the Republican primary where voter turnout is usually somewhere between 11-13 percent, a number that is cut in half for runoff elections. When the candidates the public will get to choose from in November are decided by less than 4 percent of the voting population, that doesn't give voters real choice in the general election.

In elections that heavily favors one party over another, a reality often ignored by opponents of the top-two open primary, improving voter choice means giving ALL voters an equal and meaningful say on who represents them. The nonpartisan, top-two open primary in California enhances this fundamental right by giving every voter, regardless of political affiliation, a chance to decide who ends up getting elected.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

Howorth, Allen Among Field of SD-26 Candidates Who Support Top-Two Primary

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us