The Open Primary Elections Amendment Act That Doesn't Open Primaries

The Open Primary Elections Amendment Act That Doesn't Open Primaries
Published: 07 Mar, 2014
2 min read

On Wednesday, March 5, 2014, D.C. City Council member David Grosso introduced new legislation he calls the "Open Primary Election Amendment Act." The bill would reform current election law to allow unaffiliated voters a chance to change their party affiliation up to election day if they want to vote in partisan primaries. However, by continuing to require independent voters to register with a private organization, the reform doesn't really open primaries up to all voters.

Independent voters are so for a reason. This is who they are. They do not want to be affiliated with a party because if they did, they would register with a party. It continues to be a slap in the face to the millions of voters who want to remain unaffiliated nationwide to tell them that they have to be registered with a private organization to participate in public election -- which primaries are.

From the bill:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, That this act may be cited as the “Open Primary Elections Amendment Act of 2014”. Sec. 2. Section 7(g) of the District of Columbia Election Code of 1955, approved August 12, 1955 (69 Stat. 702; D.C. Official Code § 1-1001.07(g)), is amended as follows: (a) Paragraph (4) is amended by striking the phrase "A qualified elector shall not change his or her party affiliation after the 30th day preceding an election." in its entirety. (b) Paragraph (5) is amended by striking the phrase "A qualified elector shall not change his or her party affiliation on election day." in its entirety.

The right to a meaningful vote is fundamental. It is not a right members of political parties can bestow on others, and yet some have the arrogance to tell people the conditions on which they are allowed to vote and the extent of this right. The fact that there are partisans who say that if you want to vote, join a party, shows how far we have been led astray from the founding principles of our Republic.

Photo Credit: Eva Hambach/AFP/Getty Images

You Might Also Like

New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
New IVP 2026 California Governor Poll: What the Toplines Don’t Tell You
Using verified California voter file data, IVP surveyed high-propensity voters from February 13 through 20. The poll tested first-choice ballot preferences alongside issue intensity on affordability and the cost of living, immigration enforcement, more choice reform, and more....
23 Feb, 2026
-
10 min read
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
81% of Americans Say Money Controls Politics – Can a Constitutional Amendment Fix It?
Polls consistently show that nearly all Americans across the political spectrum agree that there is too much money in politics – whether from foreign sources, corporations, or so-called “dark money” groups. ...
23 Feb, 2026
-
13 min read
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
10 Reasons Why the Congressional Stock Trading Ban Will Never Pass
The overlap between committee assignments and stock ownership is not automatically illegal. Because the current legal framework permits this proximity as long as disclosure rules are followed, lawmakers are not operating under a system that forces change....
20 Feb, 2026
-
4 min read