Open Debates 2016 Releases Criteria for Candidate Selection

image
Published: 08 Jan, 2014
2 min read

As previously reported on IVN, a coalition of third party and nonpartisan groups, including the Independent Voter Project, are combining resources in an effort to produce Open Debates 2016. The project, spearheaded by Zack Carter, is an ambitious undertaking to open national political discourse across 10 nationally-televised debates. On Wednesday, January 8, Open Debates 2016 posted the candidate selection criteria for these debates on its Facebook page.

 

OpenDebates2016.com’s Nonpartisan Candidate Selection Criteria For 2016 General Election Debate Participation

 

The mission of the nonpartisan OpenDebates2016.com is to ensure, for the benefit of the American electorate, that general election debates are held between the candidates for the office of President of the United States who have met our criteria for inclusion.

The goal of OpenDebates2016.com’s debates is to afford the members of the public an opportunity to sharpen their views, in a focused debate format, of those candidates/parties that have been disenfranchised by the Commission on Presidential Debates.In connection with the 2016 general election, OpenDebates2016.com will apply two criteria to each declared candidate to determine whether that candidate qualifies for inclusion in one or more of our debates. All criteria shall be satisfied before a candidate will be invited to debate.

 

 

 

OpenDebates2016.com’s nonpartisan criteria for selecting candidates to participate in the 2016 general election presidential debates are:

 

IVP Donate

OpenDebates2016.com’s first criterion requires satisfaction of the eligibility requirements of Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution. The requirements are satisfied if the candidate:

a. is at least 35 years of age;

b. is a natural born citizen of the United States and a resident of the United States for 14 years; and

c. is otherwise eligible under the Constitution.

 

OpenDebates2016.com’s second criterion requires that the candidate must have achieved ballot access and/or write in access in a sufficient number of states to win a theoretical Electoral College majority (270 votes) in the general election in order to qualify for debate participation in all 10 of our proposed debates and are not subject to being voted out by the audience.

Candidates who are constitutionally eligible to hold the office of President of the United States who have not achieved theoretical Electoral College majority qualify for an as-yet undetermined number of our proposed debates if they have achieved ballot access and/or write in access in a sufficient number of states to achieve a minimum of 150 theoretical Electoral College votes in the general election. However these candidates may be subject to being voted out of our debates by the viewing public.

 

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

 

OpenDebates2016.com’s determination with respect to participation in our first scheduled debate will be made by Memorial Day 2016, sufficiently in advance of the first scheduled debate to allow for orderly planning.

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read