logo

Heritage Foundation Proposed Individual Mandate in 1989 - Now Mocking It

image
Created: 14 October, 2013
Updated: 21 November, 2022
2 min read
More key provisions of the the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, are slowly rolling into effect after being passed by the 111th Congress in 2010. Perhaps most controversial among them is the individual mandate.

The individual mandate, as associated by Obamacare, requires all U.S. citizens buy private health insurance or face a penalty, with some exemptions. Although Obama campaigned against the mandate during his 2008 campaign, the policy was ultimately added to the bill in order to ensure it passed.

The lineage of the individual mandate can be traced to page 51 of the Heritage Foundation's 1989 study and policy recommendation, "A National Health System for America." The nonpartisan, free-market focused, tax-exempt think tank recommended "a legal obligation on all families to obtain a minimum level of protection against healthcare costs."

The 1989 report was oddly prescient:

"Liberals have resisted the use of market mechanisms in their efforts... [Conservatives] too share the blame for today's problems. They so far have refused to recognize that some form of comprehensive health care system in America is politically inevitable... Refusing to recognize this, conservative law-makers generally have confined themselves to trying to block popular liberal proposals to extend a flawed system, rather than offering their own plan..."

In response to the looming implementation of the individual mandate, the Heritage Foundation sponsored this advertisement, mocking the law.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVRTHmrYHlQ

The ad titled 'Obamacare: More than a Glitch' capitalizes on the online insurance exchange's disastrous debut last week. Yet, it ignores the fact that millions of Americans can, in one form or another, avoid being covered as the individual mandate exists in its current form.

The Congressional Budget Office estimated that once the mandate is completely implemented in 2016, 24 million non-elderly people will be exempt from the mandate's penalties while 30 million will still not have insurance.

This is either due to excessively low income, being a member of an American Indian tribe, their premium would exceed 8 percent of their income, hardship, or conflicts with their religious beliefs -- none of which are mentioned in the ad. Rather, it claims that to opt out you should, "start a multimillion dollar business, join a union, or run for Congress."

Undeniably, negative consequences have been seen during the phasing in of the Affordable Care Act; yet, apocalyptic claims remain exaggerated. Many hold the contention that the new health care regime won't make things much worse, but doesn't solve the long-term problems either.

More Choice for San Diego

Latest articles

A wide shot of an Alaska city.
In a True Nail-Biter, Alaska Voters Reject Repeal of Top 4 Primary and Ranked Choice Voting
Two weeks after Election Day, Alaska voters finally know the fate of their election system. The choice before them was keep the nonpartisan Top 4 primary system with ranked choice voting in the general election or go back to partisan control over elections....
21 November, 2024
-
5 min read
Coin with Trump's face on it.
How Will the New Government Affect Independent Voters' Finances?
My rates! What happened to my rates? Partisan and independent voters ranked the economy the most important issue in the 2024 election....
20 November, 2024
-
9 min read
An elephant and donkey facing each other on a red bar.
Understanding The ‘Other Side’ Is More Important Than Ever
For some of us, just reading the title of this piece may be irritating — even maddening. If you’re scared about Trump’s election, being asked to understand the “other side” can seem a distant concern compared to your fears of what might happen during his presidency....
20 November, 2024
-
4 min read