AB 327 Author Perea On the Record About California Energy Rates

image
Michael AbramsMichael Abrams
Published: 30 Aug, 2013
2 min read

California's energy rate structure is at stake during this state legislative session. Assembly Bill 327, sponsored by Assemblymember Henry Perea (D-Fresno), would allow the Public Utilities Commission to create a more equitable rate structure.

Perea and staff made clear what the provisions of AB 327 lay out for energy rates in California:

  • AB 327 will not increase residential electric rates. It will simply remove the energy crisis-era rate restrictions that currently limit the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) from adopting a new, fair, and equitable rate structure.
  • AB 327 does not mandate a permanent annual fee of $120 for solar users. Instead, it requires the CPUC to cap any fixed charge that it may establish at $10 for all customers and $5 for low income customers.
  • Increases the CARE discount to 30-35% to protect our low-income constituents.

California currently has a tiered rate structure that is not based on income. Rates for tiers 1 and 2 consumers are capped and cannot go beyond 30 percent of the baseline rate. Any increase on energy prices must be shifted to tier 3 and 4 consumers, some who are small business owners or middle class families.

San Diego Gas & Electric outlines the current rate structure:

SDGE-Energy-Rates-Tiers-2013

AB 327 has garnered a lot of attention and there has been competing petition campaigns. Environment California opposes the bill stating that it'll hurt a move towards solar energy. Their main concern is the potential for the fee on solar users, but as stated by Asm. Perea, it is not mandatory.

Environment California states:

"Given the urgency of meeting the state's clean energy goals and the immediate clean air and job benefits of investing in solar power and energy efficiency, it is critical that California policymakers act to expand--rather the constrain--California's solar market."

The petition campaign in support of AB 327, titled Fix My Energy Bill, has obtained over 10,000 signatures. Key points made by the petition are:

Energy Costs Are Rising; New taxes, clean energy mandates and inflation makes energy production more expensive.We Have an Outdated Rate Structure; Because of a 12 year-old bill, you have to pay the full cost of the price increases, while others don't.The Current System is Unsustainable; Families, seniors, and small businesses are penalized and pay more than their fair share.

AB 327 is not in its final form as of now and has been recently amended. Asm. Perea stated, "I am still working closely with all organizations, including consumer groups, to reach the best compromise possible. The bill will change from its current form as a result of ongoing negotiations."

IVP Donate

All bills circulating the legislature needs to be passed in both chambers in Sacramento by September 13. Governor Jerry Brown will then sign or veto legislation that makes it to his desk.

You Might Also Like

Proposition 50 voter guide
California Prop 50: Partisan Power Play or Necessary Counterpunch?
November 4 marks a special election for what has become the most controversial ballot measure in California in recent memory: Proposition 50, which would circumvent congressional districts drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission for a legislative-drawn map....
01 Oct, 2025
-
9 min read
court gavel.
Virtual Discussion: The Fight for Equal Independent Voting Rights Makes it to SCOTUS
Every major voting rights movement in U.S. history – whether successful or not – has intertwined with landmark litigation. This was the case for women’s suffrage. It was the case for civil rights. And it is the case in the ongoing effort to protect the right of all voters to have equal participation in taxpayer-funded elections – something millions of independent voters are denied across the U.S....
29 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read
Supreme Court building
SCOTUS Considers Challenge to Closed Primaries -- Here's Why It Is Such a Big Deal
In a dramatic step forward for litigation challenging closed primaries, the U.S. Supreme Court has indicated they are going to conference to discuss whether to grant a writ of certiorari to Polelle v. Florida Secretary of State; a case challenging Florida's closed primaries that Open Primaries has supported since its inception....
26 Sep, 2025
-
2 min read