US Military Spending Remains Too High After Sequester Cuts

image
Published: 01 May, 2013
1 min read

Last week, the issue of sequestration made the headlines again with the bipartisan decision to allocate more funds to the FAA after a flight delays around the country led to public uproar.

The sequester, which came into effect on March 1st forces the Federal government to proceed with $85 billion in budget cuts by the end of 2013. Defense programs were among the most affected with $45 billion in cuts, an 8 percent budget reduction. Over the next 10 years, defense cuts are supposed to total $500 billion.

If these cuts will certainly be felt in military towns such as San Diego and by military personel, many argue that the sequester barely impacts the defense budget and much more reduction is needed.

Since 2001, the Pentagon's budget has been virtually unrestricted with the base budget soaring from $397 billion to $557 billion in 2013. According to the Cato Institute, even with the sequester, the 2013 defense budget would only return to its 2006 level, when the US was in the midst of the Iraq and Afganistan wars.

The organization highlights that the Pentagon currently spends more money than during the height of the Cold War, when USSR was a real military competitor that had a similar military budget.

The Cato Institute argues that today's world is safer and does not require such spending. The United States spends 5 times more than its biggest competitor China.

After reading the following infographic, provided by the Cato Institute, how do you think the United States should address military spending in the coming years?

Credit: Cato Institute

US Military Spending

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read