Skip to content
Sign up free
News

EPA Approved Underground Waste Dumping for Uranium Mine Giant

By Christopher Davis-Garland

2-minute read

Photo: Abrahm Lustgarten // ProPublica

ProPublica recently published journalist Abraham Lustgarten’s special project series covering injection wells. The latest story in the series converges on Christensen Ranch in Wyoming where industry giant Uranium One mines for uranium and disposes of its waste in an aquifer with EPA permission.

However, the Safe Drinking Water Act outlawed injecting toxic and nontoxic industrial waste into or above water aquifers. Any company wishing to dispose of waste underground must first apply for a deep injection well permit and register with the Underground Injection Control Program (UIC). These permits come in several classes to distinguish between waste and industry.

For example, radioactive material in class I wells that must be deposited below the lowermost underground source of drinking water versus oil and gas waste in class II wells, which can be deposited closer to the surface. Though these different categories are supposed to help protect water sources, the Environmental Protection Agency has allowed for hundreds of exemptions nationwide in the last few decades, Christensen Ranch being one of them.

Over 25 years ago, scientists for the EPA believed water under the Christensen Ranch was “too deep” to be practically extracted and used as a public water source. Current EPA rules allow for aquifer exceptions: “1) [If] the aquifer does not currently serve as a source of drinking water; 2) the total dissolved solids content of the ground water is more than 3,000 mg/L and less than 10,000 mg/L; and, 3) the aquifer is not reasonably expected to supply a public water source in the future.”

At Christensen Ranch the problem lies within plans to increase the mining operation there. State officials have signed off on the deal, since any increase in mining means more economic activity and more tax revenue.

However, the EPA can only grant permission over increasing waste into an aquifer, and it has been slow to make a decision on the matter. Energy advocates are pushing for a renewal, given the EPA had granted permission once before and, as such, they should do it again. On the other hand, former EPA officials are concerned of well leaks and that completely removing pollutants from water is not possible.

The situation at Christensen Ranch underscores the overlaying problem of the sheer number of underground waste and injection wells. According to the UIC Well Inventory of 2011, there are 659,345 injection wells across the nation. Even in water-strapped states like California there exist a staggering 67,302 underground waste wells, the majority being class ll wells. EPA guidelines state every well is to be inspected before operations can begin and reinspected every 5 to 10 years for permits renewal. The EPA currently has a budget of $8.3 billion to use between grants, oil-spill response, improving air quality, protecting waters, technology, and enforcing current environmental laws.

For now, things are business as usual on the Christensen Ranch. It remains unclear what the EPA plans to do, although, at this point, it appears to be a numbers game rather than a test of wills.

Tags: News

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Get IVN’s Free Weekly Newsletter:Get IVN’s Free Newsletter

Nonpartisan Issues. Diverse Perspectives.

Check your inbox and click the link to confirm.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

EPA Approved Underground Waste Dumping for Uranium Mine Giant

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us