Voter Suppression, By the Numbers

image
Published: 12 Jul, 2012
2 min read

This election, an estimated five million eligible voters will be disenfranchised from the political process due to new voter identification laws. These de-facto voter suppression laws not only make it harder to register to vote, but also place restrictions on voting, creating an obstacle to eligible voters who lack government issued identification.

The Brennan Center for Justice released a study in which they outlined the changes in voting laws we face in the 2012 election and the adverse affect on voter participation.

Here's how the Brennan Center for Justice arrived at the number 5 million:

5: The number of states where new photo ID laws will be in effect (Kansas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin)

3: The number of states where new proof of citizenship laws will be in effect (Alabama, Kansas, Tennessee)

240,000: The number of potential voters in Alabama that do not have documentary proof of citizenship

2: The number of states that passed laws restricting voter registration drives, causing all or most of those drives to stop (Florida and Texas)

176,000: The number of people who registered to vote via drives

IVP Donate

5.13: The percent of voters in Texas that registered via drives

60,000: The number of Maine citizens who registered and voted on Election Day in 2008. Since Maine abolished Election Day registration, the number of potential voters adversely affected in 2012

3: The number of states where the early voting period was cut by half or more (Florida, Georgia, and Ohio)

8,000,000: The number of Americans who voted early in the above states

2: The number of states that made it substantially more difficult or impossible for people with past felony convictions to get their voting rights restored (Florida and Iowa)

1,000,000: The number of people in Florida who could have benefited from the prior practice

5: The number of battleground states that have already cut back on voting rights (and may pass additional restrictive legislation)

171: The number of electoral votes belonging to the state that have already cut back on voting rights

Let Us Vote : Sign Now!

270: The number of electoral votes needed to win the presidency

63: The percent of the total number of electoral votes affected by restrictive voter laws

You Might Also Like

Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
Ballrooms, Ballots, and a Three-Way Fight for New York
The latest Independent Voter Podcast episode takes listeners through the messy intersections of politics, reform, and public perception. Chad and Cara open with the irony of partisan outrage over trivial issues like a White House ballroom while overlooking the deeper dysfunctions in our democracy. From California to Maine, they unpack how the very words on a ballot can tilt entire elections and how both major parties manipulate language and process to maintain power....
30 Oct, 2025
-
1 min read
California Prop 50 gets an F
Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an 'F'
The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation....
30 Oct, 2025
-
3 min read
bucking party on gerrymandering
5 Politicians Bucking Their Party on Gerrymandering
Across the country, both parties are weighing whether to redraw congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Texas, California, Missouri, North Carolina, Utah, Indiana, Colorado, Illinois, and Virginia are all in various stages of the action. Here are five politicians who have declined to support redistricting efforts promoted by their own parties....
31 Oct, 2025
-
4 min read