Skip to content
Subscribe

California food startups may hold the key to economic recovery

Published:

Can food lift California out of its recession? A mounting body of evidence points to yes.  Local food startups that only source labor and materials from local and regional businesses as part of a “community food enterprise,” or CFE for short, increase prosperity and employment at the local level. CFEs keep ownership and employment a near proximate affair, growing community capital and cultivating a bountiful crop of entrepreneurs to keep the cycle going.

CFEs distinguish themselves from typical local food economies by bringing together more than just farmers and consumers. A true CFE seeks the luxuries of a global food system, only on a hyper-local level. Every link in the production chain – from growers, processors, packers, distributors and marketers – is locally sourced and all are locally or regionally aimed.

A recent San Francisco Chronicle piece provides the quintessential CFE anecdote: Bi-Rite, a San Francisco grocer, says 90 percent of its employees live within walking or bicycling distance of the store. Also, the company only uses local designers, printers and sign makers.

And the cycle continues,” reads the article. “Last year Bi-Rite started showcasing Michele Manfredi's SFQ Original San Francisco-style Barbecue Sauce in its store when her company was a tiny startup and she did everything by hand. SFQ is still fairly small, but now Manfredi can afford to outsource her kitchen work, jarring and label making. She could probably save money by scouring the Internet for cheap labor, cheap jars and even cheaper labels. But she's decided to go regional - most of her ingredients are sourced in the Bay Area, her jars are from an Oakland company, her labels are from Napa, and her preparation and jarring are done in Healdsburg.

According to owner Sam Mogannam, last year Bi-Rite spent close to $7 million doing business with regional companies, mostly Northern California-based small businesses.

Neighbors attending to neighborly needs by offering jobs represents the basic socio-economic push behind the steady growth of CFEs in recent years. Other factors, including changing consumer demand toward local/sustainable goods and services, have cultivated fertile ground for food-enterprisers. Opportunities are prevalent now that local food markets have grown into economies of regional scale after a decade plus of continuous expansion.

The report, Community Food Enterprise: Local Success in a Global Marketplace, published by the Wallace Center at Winrock International, says that price is a major factor in the current success of CFEs:

As more CFEs enter the marketplace, local food prices are trending downward. CFEs themselves are learning how to bring down their costs through greater volume, through smarter distribution techniques, through the better use of technology, and through collaboration with other CFEs.

Michael Shuman, economist, research director for the Business Alliance for Local Living Economies (BALLE) and lead author of the report calls the CFE the model of future food and fiscal policy.

"There's good evidence to show that CFEs generate more jobs - two to four times the amount per dollar of sales - and generate more income and wealth for (their) communities than non-locally owned businesses, even ones that source goods from the area," Shuman told the Chronicle. Shuman is also research director for Cutting Edge Capital, an Oakland venture capitalist company specializing in innovative financing.

Recognizing the economic pitfalls inherent in a global food system, the US Department of Agriculture has been quick to support the CFE movement. The agency has guaranteed loans to farmers who practice the model.

"Studies show that farmers who sell locally and regionally employ 13 full-time workers per $1 million revenue earned," said Deputy Secretary of Agriculture, Kathleen Merrigan. "Farmers who don't sell locally or regionally employ three workers for every $1 million in revenue earned."

The last time the numbers were gathered California farmers' markets pulled in roughly $163 million in direct marketing sales. That was in 2007. Since that time, locavorism (by all indications) has increased. With the regionalization of distribution and merchandising industries through CFEs, no matter what the current revenue stats show, it is all but guaranteed that a much greater percentage of those dollars are now staying closer to home -- reinvested into a stronger community.

Adhere to the IVN etiquette

By posting a comment, you agree to adhere to our etiquette rules: No partisan attacks, no personal attacks, substantiate your sources, no self-promotion.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Contact IVN

Questions about this article or our coverage? Send us a message. A free IVN member account is required.

Message sent

Thanks, we’ll review it and get back to you if needed.

Message not sent

Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.

Sign in to send a message

Messages are tied to your IVN member account. Signing in is free and takes a few seconds.

Republish this article

Republishing guidelines

Republish IVN articles for free. Independent Voter News articles may be republished online or in print under a Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 license, on these terms:

  1. Credit the author and IVN. Keep the byline ("By Author Name, Independent Voter News") and the attribution note at the end, which links to the original.
  2. Keep the meaning. You may update time and place references and apply your house style. You may trim for length, as long as the cuts don't change the meaning or misrepresent the author. Keep the headline. Mark any additions as your own (for example "Additional reporting by ...").
  3. Translations are welcome. Translate faithfully, add "Translated from English by [your outlet]", and tell us at editor@ivn.us.
  4. Keep the links, including the link to the original article.
  5. Keep the tracking image. The HTML includes a 1-pixel image that counts readers on your page. It collects no personal information.
  6. Photos and illustrations. Images credited to IVN may be used with this article only. Images credited to others (AP, Getty, Unsplash, Wikimedia and so on) stay under their owners' terms. Secure the rights or switch "Include images" off.
  7. Don't sell it. You can't sell our articles or sell ads specifically against them. Your normal site advertising is fine.
  8. No implied endorsement. Don't suggest that IVN or the author endorses you, your candidates or your causes, or that donations to you support IVN.
  9. Keep labels. Opinion or analysis pieces keep that label.
  10. Point search engines to the original. Where your CMS allows, set the canonical URL to the original IVN article.
  11. No bulk or automated republishing, and don't submit our articles to aggregators (Apple News, Google News, MSN) as your own.
  12. Corrections and removals. Update your copy when we correct it, and remove it promptly if we ask. We'll contact you at the email you give us.
  13. Questions or print republication: editor@ivn.us.

IVN staff: fill in who you're inviting above, then create the invite.

Preparing the article

California food startups may hold the key to economic recovery

Choose a format
  • HTML
  • Email HTML
  • Markdown
  • Formatted (.docx)
  • Plain text
  • WordPress blocks
  • PDF
Choose a platform

Photos credited to others need their owners' permission.

To for

Republishing somewhere else? Questions? editor@ivn.us